bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics54.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive152% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (59%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
12 months ago, 12 months ago.
System
MotherboardIntel NUC6i7KYB
Memory25.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren, 3840 x 1200 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160603
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 23 '23 at 21:19
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 59%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6770HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
64.5% Good
Memory 80.6
1-Core 77.6
2-Core 148
61% 102 Pts
4-Core 262
8-Core 403
41% 333 Pts
64-Core 446
28% 446 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 64.5%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing below potential (44th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
54.5% Above average
Lighting 67.9
Reflection 63.7
Parallax 59.8
55% 63.8 fps
MRender 62.2
Gravity 68.5
Splatting 63.5
53% 64.7 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 54.5%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$250
108GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B0QBXX7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 534 522 512 499 510 500 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
152% Outstanding
Read 1,296
Write 680
Mixed 544
SusWrite 513
168% 758 MB/s
4K Read 34.5
4K Write 78.6
4K Mixed 40.7
146% 51.3 MB/s
DQ Read 830
DQ Write 238
DQ Mixed 368
314% 479 MB/s
Poor: 131%
This bench: 152%
Great: 243%
Lacie d2 Professional 8TB
7TB free
Firmware: 235C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 216 211 213 214 214 221 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
112% Outstanding
Read 174
Write 179
Mixed 105
SusWrite 215
123% 168 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 0.8
248% 2.5 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 112%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT16G4SFD8213.C16FAD 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
106% Outstanding
MC Read 44.9
MC Write 54.3
MC Mixed 24.4
118% 41.2 GB/s
SC Read 12.5
SC Write 27.8
SC Mixed 18.8
56% 19.7 GB/s
Latency 79.5
50% 79.5 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 106%
Great: 108%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,549 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback