HP Pavilion Gaming Laptop 16-a0xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics5.83% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive169% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemHP Pavilion Gaming Laptop 16-a0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 87AF
Memory56.3 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200623
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 24 '23 at 02:16
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
82% Excellent
Memory 79.2
1-Core 127
2-Core 242
83% 149 Pts
4-Core 456
8-Core 728
73% 592 Pts
64-Core 854
53% 854 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 82%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
HP(103C 87AF) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8476
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
5.83% Terrible
Lighting 5.9
Reflection 84.5
Parallax 8.1
5% 32.8 fps
MRender 10.2
Gravity 6.9
Splatting 11
8% 9.37 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.83%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate BarraCuda Q5 ZP2000CV30001 2TB
985GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SU5SH017
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1654 1291 170 122 125 122 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
169% Outstanding
Read 947
Write 1,581
Mixed 1,095
SusWrite 581
238% 1,051 MB/s
4K Read 41.1
4K Write 115
4K Mixed 49.7
187% 68.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,028
DQ Write 710
DQ Mixed 662
550% 800 MB/s
Poor: 129%
This bench: 169%
Great: 308%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata 2x31.5GB
2 of 2 slots used
63GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
60.7% Good
MC Read 21.8
MC Write 23.7
MC Mixed 18.6
61% 21.4 GB/s
SC Read 12.6
SC Write 23.8
SC Mixed 19.5
53% 18.6 GB/s
Latency 82
49% 82 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 60.7%
Great: 116%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pavilion Gaming Laptop 16-a0xxx Builds (Compare 2,321 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pavilion Gaming Laptop 16-a0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback