Today's hottest deals

Micro UM690

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 100%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics31.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive185% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
19 months ago, 17 months ago.
SystemMicro UM690  (all builds)
MotherboardShenzhen F7BFC
Memory21.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221215
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateJun 26 '23 at 12:00
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User SVN-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
FP7, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
96.8% Outstanding
Memory 74.1
1-Core 172
2-Core 330
101% 192 Pts
4-Core 641
8-Core 990
101% 815 Pts
64-Core 1,324
82% 1,324 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 96.8%
Great: 102%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
AMD(1002 1681) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 23.5.2
Performing below potential (77th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
31.5% Below average
Lighting 42.2
Reflection 52.5
Parallax 73.1
34% 55.9 fps
MRender 21.5
Gravity 46.4
Splatting 27.7
26% 31.9 fps
Poor: 15%
This bench: 31.5%
Great: 35%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston OM8PGP4512Q-A0 512GB
308GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ELFK0S.6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 508 598 557 506 903 504 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
185% Outstanding
Read 316
Write 3,036
Mixed 2,205
SusWrite 596
355% 1,538 MB/s
4K Read 62.6
4K Write 181
4K Mixed 89
305% 111 MB/s
DQ Read 1,166
DQ Write 680
DQ Mixed 410
443% 752 MB/s
Poor: 185%
This bench: 185%
Great: 399%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston CBD48S40BS8MA-16 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 4200 MHz
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
119% Outstanding
MC Read 43.5
MC Write 49.2
MC Mixed 39.4
126% 44 GB/s
SC Read 25.2
SC Write 47.2
SC Mixed 28.8
96% 33.7 GB/s
Latency 92.3
43% 92.3 ns
Poor: 98%
This bench: 119%
Great: 148%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical UM690 Builds (Compare 29 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Sail boat

System: Micro UM690

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback