Today's hottest deals

Monster ABRA A5 V16.5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics2.38% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive75.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
14 months ago, 14 months ago.
SystemMonster ABRA A5 V16.5  (all builds)
MotherboardMONSTER ABRA A5 V16.5
Memory1.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20201106
Uptime5.4 Days
Run DateJul 05 '23 at 09:33
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10200H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
62.6% Good
Memory 61.5
1-Core 119
2-Core 223
73% 135 Pts
4-Core 349
8-Core 459
51% 404 Pts
64-Core 479
30% 479 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 62.6%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Clevo(1558 8535) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9365
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
2.38% Terrible
Lighting 2.9
Reflection 52.1
Parallax 3.5
2% 19.5 fps
MRender 5.5
Gravity 4.5
Splatting 0.1
2% 3.37 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.38%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial P2 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$83
30GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P2CR010 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 512 549 11 140 557 420 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
75.4% Very good
Read 319
Write 460
Mixed 319
SusWrite 365
83% 366 MB/s
4K Read 6.8
4K Write 61.4
4K Mixed 10.3
56% 26.2 MB/s
DQ Read 623
DQ Write 457
DQ Mixed 530
399% 537 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 75.4%
Great: 253%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston CBD32D4S2S1ME-8 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
21% Poor
MC Read 6.7
MC Write 7.8
MC Mixed 6.5
20% 7 GB/s
SC Read 5.6
SC Write 7
SC Mixed 5.1
17% 5.9 GB/s
Latency 123
32% 123 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 21%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ABRA A5 V16.5 Builds (Compare 185 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Monster ABRA A5 V16.5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback