ADD TO PC
BUILD

HP 250 G7 Notebook PC

Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 47% Yacht	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	6.17% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	134% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

System	HP 250 G7 Notebook PC (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 8532
Memory	10.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20210831
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jul 06 '23 at 18:52
Run Duration	156 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-8265U 87,841 User benchmarks, average bench 53% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	41.3% Average	Memory 62.7 1-Core 43.2 2-Core 86.1 40% 64 Pts	4-Core 118 8-Core 121 16% 119 Pts	64-Core 126 8% 126 Pts
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 41.3% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620 178,291 User benchmarks, average bench 5% HP(103C 8532) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8935 Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	6.17% Terrible	Lighting 6.7 Reflection 6.5 Parallax 7.7 6% 6.97 fps	MRender 9.4 Gravity 6.9 Splatting 10.8 8% 9.03 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 6.17% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Fanxiang S500PRO 512GB 626 User benchmarks, average bench 233% 314GB free (System drive) Firmware: SN08878 SusWrite @10s intervals: 689 794 906 846 874 653 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	134% Outstanding	Read 887 Write 826 Mixed 782 SusWrite 794 185% 822 MB/s	4K Read 31.5 4K Write 52.3 4K Mixed 37.6 124% 40.5 MB/s	DQ Read 298 DQ Write 214 DQ Mixed 268 197% 260 MB/s
Poor: 134% ↑ This bench: 134% Great: 302%
HP S650 960GB 147 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 834GB free Firmware: W0419B0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 293 333 370 369 388 390 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	69.6% Good	Read 450 Write 405 Mixed 371 SusWrite 357 89% 396 MB/s	4K Read 23.3 4K Write 45.6 4K Mixed 14.6 78% 27.8 MB/s	DQ Read 124 DQ Write 183 DQ Mixed 33.3 59% 113 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 69.6% Great: 105%
JMicron 500GB 545 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 56GB free Firmware: 0508 SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 33 35 34 34 36 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	18.2% Very poor	Read 29.9 Write 31 Mixed 25.3 SusWrite 33.4 22% 29.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.4 85% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 18.2% Great: 67%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Team Group Inc TEAMGROUP-SD4-3200 2x8GB 494 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	56.3% Above average	MC Read 18.7 MC Write 24.5 MC Mixed 20.3 60% 21.2 GB/s	SC Read 7.7 SC Write 17.4 SC Mixed 13.2 36% 12.8 GB/s	Latency 120 33% 120 ns
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 56.3% Great: 104%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Typical 250 G7 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 2,883 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop

Desktop 54%

Yacht

Workstation

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: HP 250 G7 Notebook PC

CPU
Core i5-8265UIntelBench 53%, 87,841 samples	801x
Core i5-1035G1IntelBench 51%, 53,170 samples	594x
Core i3-1005G1IntelBench 44%, 22,960 samples	485x

GPU
UHD G1IntelBench 5%, 68,603 samples	1,020x
UHD Graphics 620IntelBench 5%, 178,291 samples	819x
HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 387,149 samples	337x

SSD
MZVLQ256HAJD-000H1 256GBSamsungBench 114%, 12,950 samples	278x
TOSHIBA 256GBKbg30zmv256gBench 99%, 31,797 samples	164x
KIOXIA 256GBKbg40znv256gBench 138%, 13,541 samples	137x

RAM
M471A1K43CB1-CTD 1x8GBSamsungBench 40%, 96,646 samples	247x
M471A5244CB0-CTD 1x4GBSamsungBench 30%, 48,985 samples	200x
HP26D4S9S8HJ-8 1x8GBKingstonBench 40%, 4,524 samples	157x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $168	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback