Asus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS WIFI II

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive192% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (58%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS WIFI II  (all builds)
Memory4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.6 GHz
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230223
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 09 '23 at 17:08
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU 58%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$160
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
78% Very good
Memory 68.2
1-Core 128
2-Core 257
81% 151 Pts
4-Core 470
8-Core 835
79% 653 Pts
64-Core 1237
77% 1237 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 78%
Great: 94%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$89
880GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 672 678 679 670 670 655 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
192% Outstanding
Read 1,336
Write 1,720
Mixed 1,366
SusWrite 671
287% 1,273 MB/s
4K Read 31.1
4K Write 74.1
4K Mixed 56.5
159% 53.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,180
DQ Write 925
DQ Mixed 1072
797% 1,059 MB/s
Poor: 149%
This bench: 192%
Great: 365%
ROG ESD-S1C 1TB
657GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 172 172 172 171 170 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
58.3% Above average
Read 313
Write 281
Mixed 319
SusWrite 171
61% 271 MB/s
4K Read 28.1
4K Write 23.5
4K Mixed 20.4
81% 24 MB/s
DQ Read 261
DQ Write 223
DQ Mixed 237
179% 240 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 58.3%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905702-082.A00G 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
52.6% Above average
MC Read 20.8
MC Write 19.5
MC Mixed 16.9
54% 19.1 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 14.7
SC Mixed 14.3
41% 14.3 GB/s
Latency 106
38% 106 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 52.6%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING B550-PLUS WIFI II Builds (Compare 1,871 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS WIFI II

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 119% - Outstanding Total price: $472
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback