bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (94th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 6 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics20.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced. Very high background CPU (65%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemVMware, VMware Virtual Platform
MotherboardIntel 440BX Desktop Reference Platform
Memory12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 0 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181212
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 10 '23 at 04:33
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 65%

 PC Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2667 v2
CPU #000, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
62.1% Good
Memory 55
1-Core 88.1
2-Core 179
59% 107 Pts
4-Core 370
8-Core 654
62% 512 Pts
64-Core 681
42% 681 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 62.1%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GRID K240Q
Nvidia(10DE 101A) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 370.41
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
20.6% Poor
Lighting 24
Reflection 27.1
Parallax 32.4
20% 27.8 fps
MRender 36.3
Gravity 24
Splatting 24.7
23% 28.3 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 20.6%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vmware Virtual disk 275GB
14GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 531
Write 314
Mixed 318
86% 388 MB/s
4K Read 18.9
4K Write 18.4
4K Mixed 19.4
63% 18.9 MB/s
DQ Read 228
DQ Write 111
DQ Mixed 79.7
83% 140 MB/s
Poor: 29% Great: 83%
Vmware Virtual disk 3.5TB
3TB free
Firmware: 2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.3 69 174 166 195 167 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
53.6% Above average
Read 442
Write 217
Mixed 307
SusWrite 129
61% 274 MB/s
4K Read 19.4
4K Write 17
4K Mixed 18.7
62% 18.4 MB/s
DQ Read 232
DQ Write 155
DQ Mixed 82.3
92% 156 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 53.6%
Great: 54%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x16GB
1 of 128 slots used
16GB DIMM DRAM
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
91.7% Outstanding
MC Read 59.5
MC Write 25.2
MC Mixed 31.2
110% 38.6 GB/s
SC Read 8.9
SC Write 3.1
SC Mixed 4.5
16% 5.5 GB/s
Latency 143
28% 143 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 91.7%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,558 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback