Today's hottest deals

Asus X510UNR

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 44%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.04% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive54.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus X510UNR  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X510UNR
Memory7.2 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 色彩
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190514
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateJul 10 '23 at 14:32
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User TWN-User
Background CPU 24%

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8250U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.65 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
44% Average
Memory 64
1-Core 68.9
2-Core 88.5
47% 73.8 Pts
4-Core 135
8-Core 172
20% 154 Pts
64-Core 189
12% 189 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 44%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R)
Asus(1043 163E) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8682
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
3.04% Terrible
Lighting 4
Reflection 21.5
Parallax 4.7
3% 10.1 fps
MRender 6.2
Gravity 4.4
Splatting 0.3
3% 3.63 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.04%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba THNSNK256GVN8 256GB
55GB free (System drive)
Firmware: K8AS4102
SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 159 241 177 128 160 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
54.9% Above average
Read 359
Write 225
Mixed 195
SusWrite 173
53% 238 MB/s
4K Read 13.8
4K Write 22.1
4K Mixed 20.9
59% 18.9 MB/s
DQ Read 317
DQ Write 180
DQ Mixed 144
135% 213 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 54.9%
Great: 81%
Seagate ST1000LM048-2E7172 1TB
361GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 80 85 81 80 82 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
43.5% Average
Read 68.4
Write 81
Mixed 43.8
SusWrite 81.9
50% 68.8 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 4.5
4K Mixed 0.5
181% 2 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 43.5%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905624-007.A00G Hynix HMA851S6AFR6N-UH 12GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
36.4% Below average
MC Read 13.5
MC Write 13.2
MC Mixed 11.8
37% 12.8 GB/s
SC Read 7.5
SC Write 12.6
SC Mixed 10.9
30% 10.3 GB/s
Latency 116
34% 116 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 36.4%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X510UNR Builds (Compare 829 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Asus X510UNR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $298WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $240Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback