Today's hottest deals

HP Laptop 15-bw0xx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 36%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics3.97% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Laptop 15-bw0xx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8333
Memory1.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170705
Uptime1.7 Days
Run DateJul 12 '23 at 11:16
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU 33%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-9620P APU (2016 M.BR)
Socket FP4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
35.4% Below average
Memory 55.4
1-Core 36
2-Core 66.5
34% 52.6 Pts
4-Core 90.1
8-Core 96
12% 93.1 Pts
64-Core 99.5
6% 99.5 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 35.4%
Great: 45%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 Graphics
HP(103C 8333) 80MB
Ram: 80MB, Driver: 22.6.1
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
3.97% Terrible
Lighting 4.8
Reflection 6.2
Parallax 7.6
4% 6.2 fps
MRender 3
Gravity 5.7
Splatting 5.8
4% 4.83 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.97%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$35
68GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 179 169 194 206 180 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
23.4% Poor
Read 97.8
Write 90.5
Mixed 76.9
SusWrite 184
25% 112 MB/s
4K Read 6
4K Write 10.1
4K Mixed 5.9
22% 7.33 MB/s
DQ Read 17.8
DQ Write 49.3
DQ Mixed 51.1
34% 39.4 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 23.4%
Great: 102%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2004)-$38
52GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 46 38 41 37 32 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
27.2% Poor
Read 55.4
Write 69.7
Mixed 39.9
SusWrite 39.1
38% 51 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
120% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 27.2%
Great: 62%
Usb3.0 Super Speed 240GB
15GB free
Firmware: 0214
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 34 32 33 34 33 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
20.2% Poor
Read 34.1
Write 34.4
Mixed 34.2
SusWrite 33.3
25% 34 MB/s
4K Read 6.8
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 5.2
911% 4.9 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 20.2%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF51264HZ-2G3B1 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
15.5% Very poor
MC Read 5.8
MC Write 4.8
MC Mixed 5
15% 5.2 GB/s
SC Read 3.3
SC Write 3.3
SC Mixed 3.8
10% 3.47 GB/s
Latency 142
28% 142 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 15.5%
Great: 39%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Laptop 15-bw0xx Builds (Compare 713 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: HP Laptop 15-bw0xx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 23% - Poor Total price: $25
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $278WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback