Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS

Performance Results


Gaming 72% Battleship	Desktop 95% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 67% Battle cruiser


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	79.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	412% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (all builds)
Memory	56.8 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20220224
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 14 '23 at 16:35
Run Duration	247 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	23%

Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$120 383,420 User benchmarks, average bench 96% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	84.2% Excellent	Memory 73.8 1-Core 150 2-Core 296 92% 173 Pts	4-Core 508 8-Core 759 79% 633 Pts	64-Core 999 62% 999 Pts
Poor: 83% ↑ This bench: 84.2% Great: 107%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155 259,091 User benchmarks, average bench 43% Gigabyte(1458 4026) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 511.79 Performing below potential (48^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	42.1% Average	Lighting 51.3 Reflection 55.8 Parallax 52.3 42% 53.1 fps	MRender 64.8 Gravity 49.2 Splatting 46 43% 53.3 fps
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 42.1% Great: 46%
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143 318,562 User benchmarks, average bench 76% MSI(1462 3750) CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 511.79 Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	79.6% Very good	Lighting 102 Reflection 98.4 Parallax 90.3 83% 97 fps	MRender 99.5 Gravity 91.9 Splatting 78.2 72% 89.9 fps
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 79.6% Great: 81%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial P5 Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$193 14,975 User benchmarks, average bench 438% 1TB free (System drive) Firmware: P7CR402 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 2583 3001 3025 2959 2876 2966 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	412% Outstanding	Read 3,536 Write 3,095 Mixed 2,381 SusWrite 2,902 669% 2,979 MB/s	4K Read 50 4K Write 81.3 4K Mixed 60.7 197% 64 MB/s	DQ Read 942 DQ Write 510 DQ Mixed 758 555% 737 MB/s
Poor: 261% ↑ This bench: 412% Great: 564%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 169GB free Firmware: EMT0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 48 50 48 47 48 MB/s Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	39.4% Below average	Read 348 Write 356 Mixed 280 SusWrite 48 58% 258 MB/s	4K Read 17.2 4K Write 26.3 4K Mixed 18.8 64% 20.8 MB/s	DQ Read 52.1 DQ Write 66.6 DQ Mixed 54.1 42% 57.6 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 39.4% Great: 124%
Amd-raid Array 3 2TB 149 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 2TB free Firmware: 9.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 47 48 47 47 47 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	42.1% Average	Read 99.2 Write 100 Mixed 96.9 SusWrite 46.9 64% 85.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.9 166% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 42.1% Great: 103%
Amd-raid Array 1 2TB 699 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 2TB free Firmware: 9.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 43 44 43 43 43 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	40% Average	Read 95.7 Write 100 Mixed 99.3 SusWrite 43.2 64% 84.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.8 161% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 40% Great: 107%
Amd-raid Array 4 2TB 45 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 2TB free Firmware: 9.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 42 44 43 43 43 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	39.1% Below average	Read 92.7 Write 92.6 Mixed 99.6 SusWrite 42.6 61% 81.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 3.4 4K Mixed 0.3 121% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 39.1% Great: 108%
Seagate FA GoFlex Desk 2TB 2,127 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 1.5TB free, PID 5071 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 39 40 40 40 40 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	16.8% Very poor	Read 38.1 Write 38.9 Mixed 29.7 SusWrite 39.4 50% 36.5 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.8 58% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 16.8% Great: 18%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT32G4DFD832A.M16FF CT32G4DFD8266.C16FE 63GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 2666, 2666 MHz 32767, 32767 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	79.2% Very good	MC Read 34.2 MC Write 20 MC Mixed 32 82% 28.7 GB/s	SC Read 25.3 SC Write 19.1 SC Mixed 26.6 68% 23.7 GB/s	Latency 92.8 43% 92.8 ns
Poor: 79% ↑ This bench: 79.2% Great: 82%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS Builds (Compare 6,880 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 129%

UFO

Desktop 94%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 130%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS - $178

CPU
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $200Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	1,312x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $120Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	876x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $180Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	840x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	575x
RTX 3080Nvidia $879Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	519x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	407x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $93Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	343x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $107Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	276x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $70Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	266x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	242x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 93%, 89,024 samples	143x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $60Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	142x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 87% - Excellent

Total price: $1,011

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16