Gigabyte GA-AB350-Gaming-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics27% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGigabyte AB350-Gaming
MotherboardGigabyte GA-AB350-Gaming-CF  (all builds)
Memory10.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170821
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 18 '23 at 17:28
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User BIH-User
Background CPU 11%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1500X-$121
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
74.4% Very good
Memory 72.1
1-Core 111
2-Core 216
74% 133 Pts
4-Core 415
8-Core 582
63% 498 Pts
64-Core 586
36% 586 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 74.4%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Asus(1043 8613) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 536.40
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
27% Poor
Lighting 33.1
Reflection 38.7
Parallax 37.9
27% 36.6 fps
MRender 38
Gravity 37.7
Splatting 26.6
27% 34.1 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 27%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apacer AS510S 64GB
1GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AP211PE0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 229
Write 107
Mixed 120
33% 152 MB/s
4K Read 22.7
4K Write 50.5
4K Mixed 0.4
62% 24.5 MB/s
DQ Read 70.9
DQ Write 7.7
DQ Mixed 8.7
14% 29.1 MB/s
Poor: 31% Great: 55%
SSD_M.2_PCIe3_256GB_InnovationIT 256GB
238GB free
Firmware: T0918A0L Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1068 1195 1197 1220 1229 1226 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
201% Outstanding
Read 1,368
Write 1,222
Mixed 930
SusWrite 1,189
265% 1,177 MB/s
4K Read 43.4
4K Write 131
4K Mixed 27.3
170% 67.1 MB/s
DQ Read 370
DQ Write 733
DQ Mixed 355
326% 486 MB/s
Poor: 96%
This bench: 201%
Great: 223%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35
161GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 110 109 111 108 109 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
70.8% Very good
Read 137
Write 143
Mixed 64.7
SusWrite 109
83% 114 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.2
234% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 70.8%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905678-138.A00G 99U5702-094.A00G 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
85.3% Excellent
MC Read 33.3
MC Write 31.5
MC Mixed 28.5
89% 31.1 GB/s
SC Read 20.1
SC Write 31.8
SC Mixed 24.3
73% 25.4 GB/s
Latency 96.7
41% 96.7 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 85.3%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 21.5" 1280 720 GSM5804 M2262DP
Typical GA-AB350-Gaming-CF Builds (Compare 1,138 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AB350-Gaming-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Outstanding Total price: $357
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback