Today's hottest deals

MSI MAG X570 TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7C84)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 317%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 313%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 102%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics326% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive183% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C84
MotherboardMSI MAG X570 TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7C84)  (all builds)
Memory23.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210120
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 22 '23 at 03:34
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X-$358
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
102% Outstanding
Memory 86.2
1-Core 171
2-Core 336
106% 198 Pts
4-Core 630
8-Core 1,072
103% 851 Pts
64-Core 1,478
91% 1,478 Pts
Poor: 90%
This bench: 102%
Great: 110%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4090-$1,802
CLim: 3165 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 528.02
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
326% Outstanding
Lighting 479
Reflection 580
Parallax 785
390% 615 fps
MRender 529
Gravity 564
Splatting 298
363% 464 fps
Poor: 290%
This bench: 326%
Great: 402%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair MP400 1TB
256GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFM53.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 460 128 131 157 208 134 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
183% Outstanding
Read 1,315
Write 2,060
Mixed 1,311
SusWrite 203
275% 1,222 MB/s
4K Read 43.3
4K Write 166
4K Mixed 70.6
244% 93.2 MB/s
DQ Read 762
DQ Write 1,128
DQ Mixed 960
722% 950 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 183%
Great: 308%
Amd-raid Array 1 12TB
5.5TB free
Firmware: 9.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 14 28 23 29 28 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
38.3% Below average
Read 101
Write 100
Mixed 81.3
SusWrite 30.9
58% 78.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 0.5
227% 2.5 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 38.3%
Great: 293%
Amd-raid Array 2 6TB
5.5TB free
Firmware: 9.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5 28 28 26 28 28 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
21.2% Poor
Read 49
Write 61.3
Mixed 67.5
SusWrite 23.9
38% 50.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 0.3
137% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 21.2%
Great: 120%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW32GX4M2E3200C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
84.4% Excellent
MC Read 33.8
MC Write 23.5
MC Mixed 31.3
84% 29.5 GB/s
SC Read 27.7
SC Write 23.7
SC Mixed 34.1
81% 28.5 GB/s
Latency 71.1
56% 71.1 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 84.4%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 165 31.5" 1280 720 GSM776F LG ULTRAGEAR
Typical MAG X570 TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7C84) Builds (Compare 7,642 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 182%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 182%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MAG X570 TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7C84) - $220

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $1,206
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $82
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback