Today's hottest deals

Monster ABRA A5 V1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.73% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive82.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMonster ABRA A5 V1  (all builds)
MotherboardMONSTER ABRA A5 V1
Memory6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140408
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 15 '17 at 18:19
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4710MQ-$38
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
69.7% Good
Memory 85.4
1-Core 95.3
2-Core 171
70% 117 Pts
4-Core 292
8-Core 423
45% 358 Pts
64-Core 421
26% 421 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 69.7%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Clevo(1558 3501) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4835
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
3.73% Terrible
Lighting 3.87
Reflection 15.8
Parallax 6.41
3% 8.71 fps
MRender 7.24
Gravity 2.33
Splatting 7.65
5% 5.74 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.73%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
76GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
82.2% Excellent
Read 514
Write 404
Mixed 422
99% 447 MB/s
4K Read 36.4
4K Write 63.9
4K Mixed 21.9
117% 40.7 MB/s
DQ Read 38.3
DQ Write 72
DQ Mixed 118
72% 76.3 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 82.2%
Great: 124%
Samsung HM500JI 500GB-$100
20GB free
Firmware: 2AC101C4 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
36.9% Below average
Read 57.1
Write 71.2
Mixed 78.6
52% 69 MB/s
4K Read 0.24
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.24
68% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 36.9%
Great: 47%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron OEM MONSTER 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
32.1% Below average
MC Read 11.3
MC Write 10.3
MC Mixed 8.7
29% 10.1 GB/s
SC Read 10.1
SC Write 11.6
SC Mixed 10.7
31% 10.8 GB/s
Latency 71.7
56% 71.7 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 32.1%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ABRA A5 V1 Builds (Compare 56 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Monster ABRA A5 V1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 103% - Outstanding Total price: $38
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $298WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback