Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	47.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

PC Performing as expected (47^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS 2,231 User benchmarks, average bench 86% FP8, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	88.2% Excellent	Memory 48.7 1-Core 181 2-Core 358 98% 196 Pts	4-Core 682 8-Core 1,137 111% 910 Pts	64-Core 1,563 97% 1,563 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 88.2% Great: 110%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon 780M 1,815 User benchmarks, average bench 36% AMD(1002 0124) 2GB Ram: 2GB, Driver: 22.40.03.38 Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	47.9% Average	Lighting 55.7 Reflection 12.3 Parallax 74.4 45% 47.5 fps	MRender 12.3 Gravity 72.8 Splatting 93.1 53% 59.4 fps
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 47.9% Great: 53%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Zhitai TiPlus7100 1TB 37 User benchmarks, average bench 447% 908GB free (System drive) Firmware: ZTA22003 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 2,456 Write 2092 Mixed 1,950 482% 2,166 MB/s	4K Read 55.6 4K Write 118 4K Mixed 70.9 237% 81.4 MB/s	DQ Read 1,024 DQ Write 343 DQ Mixed 920 617% 762 MB/s
Poor: 208% Great: 557%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M425R4GA3BB0-CWMOL 1x31GB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 1 of 2 slots used 31GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 5600 MHz Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	40.7% Average	MC Read 12.2 MC Write 15.8 MC Mixed 16.3 42% 14.8 GB/s	SC Read 9.8 SC Write 12.8 SC Mixed 12.9 34% 11.8 GB/s	Latency 166 24% 166 ns
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 40.7% Great: 90%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	71	59	60	0"	1280 720	HP P24 G4

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 41%

Speed boat

Desktop 95%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 42%

Speed boat

CPU
Ryzen 9 7940HSAMDBench 86%, 2,231 samples	6x

GPU
Radeon 780MAMDBench 36%, 1,815 samples	6x

SSD
OM8PGP41024Q-A0 1TBKingstonBench 316%, 620 samples	3x
Array 1 4TBAmd-raidBench 277%, 614 samples	1x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TBSamsung $158Bench 336%, 200,600 samples	1x

RAM
CBD56S46BS8HA-16 2x16GBKingstonBench 141%, 137 samples	3x
CBD56S46BD8HA-32 2x31.5GBKingstonBench 141%, 165 samples	2x
F5-5600S4040A32G 2x31.5GBUnknownBench 146%, 65 samples	1x