Intel X79M-S

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (9th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 91 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics32.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive47.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardIntel X79M-S  (all builds)
Memory11 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201225
Uptime4.1 Days
Run DateJul 27 '23 at 21:20
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
64.2% Good
Memory 71.4
1-Core 63.7
2-Core 136
54% 90.5 Pts
4-Core 307
8-Core 562
52% 434 Pts
64-Core 762
47% 762 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 64.2%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-2048SP
AMD(1002 0B31) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1284 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 23.7.1
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
32.5% Below average
Lighting 36.3
Reflection 56
Parallax 57.7
30% 50 fps
MRender 55.7
Gravity 45.4
Splatting 41.1
38% 47.4 fps
Poor: 33%
This bench: 32.5%
Great: 47%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Xraydisk 512GB SSD 512GB
309GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HC2705H3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 185 184 204 171 212 218 MB/s
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
47.5% Average
Read 231
Write 212
Mixed 205
SusWrite 196
48% 211 MB/s
4K Read 22.7
4K Write 34
4K Mixed 9.8
65% 22.2 MB/s
DQ Read 181
DQ Write 163
DQ Mixed 15.5
54% 120 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 47.5%
Great: 235%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 18JSF1G72PZ-1 2x8GB
2 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
28.9% Poor
MC Read 10.5
MC Write 8.9
MC Mixed 9
27% 9.47 GB/s
SC Read 9.5
SC Write 10.2
SC Mixed 8.4
27% 9.37 GB/s
Latency 98.2
41% 98.2 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 28.9%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 59 60 26.1" 1280 720 TSB0000 DTV
Typical X79M-S Builds (Compare 596 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Intel X79M-S

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback