Asus TUF GAMING B560M-PLUS WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 141%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics145% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive223% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B560M-PLUS WIFI  (all builds)
Memory25.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210427
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 29 '23 at 03:56
Run Duration204 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-11400-$117
LGA1200, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
96.3% Outstanding
Memory 91.6
1-Core 148
2-Core 291
97% 177 Pts
4-Core 543
8-Core 835
85% 689 Pts
64-Core 1,124
70% 1,124 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 96.3%
Great: 101%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$495
EVGA(3842 3755) ≥ 4GB; EVGA XC3 ULTRA
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 531.79
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
145% Outstanding
Lighting 212
Reflection 204
Parallax 190
173% 202 fps
MRender 184
Gravity 147
Splatting 128
122% 153 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 145%
Great: 158%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$72
319GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1598 783 309 318 312 227 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
223% Outstanding
Read 1,534
Write 1,860
Mixed 1623
SusWrite 591
316% 1,402 MB/s
4K Read 53.1
4K Write 120
4K Mixed 71.1
235% 81.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1304
DQ Write 1,070
DQ Mixed 1,165
878% 1,180 MB/s
Poor: 144%
This bench: 223%
Great: 295%
MSI M390 1TB
256GB free
Firmware: EHFM32.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2470 2601 2487 201 566 572 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
303% Outstanding
Read 1,610
Write 2,603
Mixed 1,430
SusWrite 1,483
403% 1,781 MB/s
4K Read 56.4
4K Write 217
4K Mixed 74.7
296% 116 MB/s
DQ Read 1,442
DQ Write 1,167
DQ Mixed 1,290
970% 1,300 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 303%
Great: 362%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
462GB free
Firmware: LFM3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 105 98 103 104 103 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
56.2% Above average
Read 95.3
Write 104
Mixed 64
SusWrite 101
67% 90.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.4
107% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 56.2%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AX4U32008G16A-DW50 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
103% Outstanding
MC Read 37.1
MC Write 38.1
MC Mixed 35.5
105% 36.9 GB/s
SC Read 25.3
SC Write 43.5
SC Mixed 28.3
92% 32.4 GB/s
Latency 64.8
62% 64.8 ns
Poor: 74%
This bench: 103%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 144 27" 2560 1440 AOC2702 Q27G2G4
Typical TUF GAMING B560M-PLUS WIFI Builds (Compare 6,939 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 97%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 89%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B560M-PLUS WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 104% - Outstanding Total price: $513
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $250WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback