Asrock B550M Pro SE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics45.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive213% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock B550M Pro SE  (all builds)
Memory24.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors, 1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230713
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateDec 22 '23 at 22:55
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G-$75
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
62.6% Good
Memory 67.6
1-Core 103
2-Core 217
70% 129 Pts
4-Core 339
8-Core 309
44% 324 Pts
64-Core 337
21% 337 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 62.6%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650
Nvidia(10DE 145C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 546.33
Performing below potential (45th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
45.6% Average
Lighting 56.8
Reflection 58.2
Parallax 51
46% 55.3 fps
MRender 63
Gravity 49.8
Splatting 50.8
44% 54.5 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 45.6%
Great: 50%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kbg50znv512g KIOXIA 512GB
274GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP01AN00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1390 1113 388 420 422 420 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
213% Outstanding
Read 2,033
Write 1792
Mixed 1,335
SusWrite 692
327% 1,463 MB/s
4K Read 49.8
4K Write 98.3
4K Mixed 50.6
192% 66.2 MB/s
DQ Read 867
DQ Write 517
DQ Mixed 651
496% 678 MB/s
Poor: 98%
This bench: 213%
Great: 261%
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$60
27GB free
Firmware: UF400400
SusWrite @10s intervals: 185 95 51 42 21 32 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
43.7% Average
Read 425
Write 372
Mixed 185
SusWrite 71.2
58% 263 MB/s
4K Read 20.2
4K Write 35.4
4K Mixed 11.7
64% 22.4 MB/s
DQ Read 118
DQ Write 37.4
DQ Mixed 35
37% 63.5 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 43.7%
Great: 55%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AX4U32008G16A-DW50 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
73.7% Very good
MC Read 28.8
MC Write 27.6
MC Mixed 25.7
78% 27.4 GB/s
SC Read 12.2
SC Write 24.4
SC Mixed 21.9
56% 19.5 GB/s
Latency 109
37% 109 ns
Poor: 74%
This bench: 73.7%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 64 48 60 0.7" 1280 720 LRX2281
Typical B550M Pro SE Builds (Compare 116 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 100%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asrock B550M Pro SE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $390
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback