Asrock H81M-HDS

Performance Results


Gaming 36% Jet ski	Desktop 79% Battleship	Workstation 29% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	45.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asrock H81M-HDS (all builds)
Memory	3.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150109
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 30 '23 at 01:16
Run Duration	150 Seconds
Run User	NZL-User
Background CPU	23%

PC Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4790-$135 255,027 User benchmarks, average bench 71% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	69.7% Good	Memory 85.7 1-Core 104 2-Core 199 75% 129 Pts	4-Core 300 8-Core 373 43% 337 Pts	64-Core 376 23% 376 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 69.7% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200 834,238 User benchmarks, average bench 49% MSI(1462 3160) CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 536.67 Performing below potential (27^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	45.7% Average	Lighting 54.9 Reflection 67.4 Parallax 59.8 45% 60.7 fps	MRender 64.9 Gravity 57.1 Splatting 54.2 48% 58.7 fps
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 45.7% Great: 54%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 525GB-$150 105,037 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 330GB free (System drive) Firmware: M0CR060 SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 338 402 449 461 459 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 65% Great: 99%
Asmt ASM1156-PM 240GB 75 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 152GB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 272 222 255 276 286 285 MB/s Performing below potential (33^rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	48.9% Average	Read 242 Write 254 Mixed 231 SusWrite 266 56% 248 MB/s	4K Read 15.3 4K Write 36.1 4K Mixed 13.8 60% 21.7 MB/s	DQ Read 69.8 DQ Write 150 DQ Mixed 23.1 42% 80.9 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 48.9% Great: 67%
Samsung 870 QVO 1TB-$100 80,665 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 436GB free Firmware: SVQ01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 234 187 219 239 246 245 MB/s Performing below potential (22^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	72.5% Very good	Read 257 Write 239 Mixed 217 SusWrite 228 53% 235 MB/s	4K Read 25.9 4K Write 64.3 4K Mixed 41 126% 43.7 MB/s	DQ Read 198 DQ Write 185 DQ Mixed 191 143% 191 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 72.5% Great: 128%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown F3-14900CL9-4GBXL 1313 SRT4G88U1-P9Z 8GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	55.7% Above average	MC Read 20.4 MC Write 21.2 MC Mixed 17 56% 19.5 GB/s	SC Read 11.8 SC Write 19.7 SC Mixed 16 45% 15.8 GB/s	Latency 71.4 56% 71.4 ns
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 55.7% Great: 58%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 24: 0P 3R 2G 3B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
24%	13%	62	218	60	60	27"	1920 1080	PHLC0C8 PHL 274E5

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H81M-HDS Builds (Compare 1,146 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 66%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock H81M-HDS - $147

CPU
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	174x
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples	165x
Core i5-4590Intel $188Bench 63%, 151,366 samples	101x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	134x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	75x
GTX 1070Nvidia $278Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	57x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	27x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $36Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	25x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	25x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	89x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	23x
Ballistix Sport DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCrucialBench 56%, 44,086 samples	23x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 74% - Very good

Total price: $325

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359