Acer Swift SF314-44

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics10.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemAcer Swift SF314-44  (all builds)
MotherboardBCU Dolphin_BCU
Memory10.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221028
Uptime3.1 Days
Run DateJul 31 '23 at 00:08
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5825U Graphics
FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 1.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
42% Average
Memory 41.5
1-Core 62.4
2-Core 107
40% 70.4 Pts
4-Core 229
8-Core 355
36% 292 Pts
64-Core 638
40% 638 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 42%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
Acer(1025 1620) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 22.20.32
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
10.9% Very poor
Lighting 8.9
Reflection 18.5
Parallax 32.6
7% 20 fps
MRender 15.1
Gravity 28.1
Splatting 22.2
18% 21.8 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 10.9%
Great: 18%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston OM8SEP4512Q-AA 512GB
421GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBI00111
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,038
Write 891
Mixed 876
208% 935 MB/s
4K Read 25.2
4K Write 39.3
4K Mixed 22.4
88% 29 MB/s
DQ Read 412
DQ Write 263
DQ Mixed 427
294% 367 MB/s
Poor: 117% Great: 258%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung K4UBE3D4AA-MGCR 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB LPDDR4 clocked @ 4266 MHz
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
77.5% Very good
MC Read 31.5
MC Write 28.8
MC Mixed 27.4
84% 29.2 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 24.7
SC Mixed 23.8
61% 21.3 GB/s
Latency 196
20% 196 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 77.5%
Great: 129%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 57 0 14" 1280 720 BOE099B
Typical Swift SF314-44 Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

System: Acer Swift SF314-44

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback