Acer Swift SFG14-41

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics10.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive117% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
7 months ago, 7 months ago.
SystemAcer Swift SFG14-41  (all builds)
MotherboardBCU Dolphin_BCU
Memory3.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 4.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221028
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateNov 29 '23 at 07:21
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 7530U Graphics
FP6, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 1.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
51.2% Above average
Memory 61
1-Core 62.7
2-Core 116
48% 79.8 Pts
4-Core 224
8-Core 391
37% 307 Pts
64-Core 472
29% 472 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 51.2%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
Acer(1025 1620) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 23.11.1
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
10.3% Very poor
Lighting 8.1
Reflection 19
Parallax 29.4
7% 18.8 fps
MRender 15.5
Gravity 25
Splatting 22.4
17% 21 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 10.3%
Great: 18%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston OM8SEP4512Q-AA 512GB
240GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBI00111
SusWrite @10s intervals: 832 712 348 372 372 363 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
117% Outstanding
Read 994
Write 774
Mixed 801
SusWrite 500
172% 767 MB/s
4K Read 25.1
4K Write 48.7
4K Mixed 23
93% 32.3 MB/s
DQ Read 523
DQ Write 310
DQ Mixed 485
343% 440 MB/s
Poor: 117%
This bench: 117%
Great: 258%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix H9HCNNNBKMMLXR-NEE 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB LPDDR4 clocked @ 4266 MHz
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
70.7% Very good
MC Read 27.6
MC Write 24.5
MC Mixed 27
75% 26.4 GB/s
SC Read 14.2
SC Write 23.1
SC Mixed 18.3
53% 18.5 GB/s
Latency 120
33% 120 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 70.7%
Great: 120%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 0 14" 1280 720 BOE099B
Typical Swift SFG14-41 Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

System: Acer Swift SFG14-41

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $250WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback