Today's hottest deals

Asus ROG STRIX X670E-E GAMING WIFI

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 412%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 108%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 542%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 117%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics374% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
13 months ago, 12 months ago.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX X670E-E GAMING WIFI  (all builds)
Memory111.8 GB free of 128 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230223
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateAug 03 '23 at 10:34
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X-$470
AM5, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 4.5 GHz, turbo 5.25 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
117% Outstanding
Memory 76.8
1-Core 215
2-Core 424
122% 239 Pts
4-Core 835
8-Core 1,599
145% 1,217 Pts
64-Core 3,708
230% 3,708 Pts
Poor: 104%
This bench: 117%
Great: 124%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4090-$1,735
Nvidia(10DE 167C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3165 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 22.5GB, Driver: 536.67
Performing below potential (43rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
374% Outstanding
Lighting 592
Reflection 586
Parallax 799
482% 659 fps
MRender 540
Gravity 578
Splatting 281
363% 466 fps
Poor: 290%
This bench: 374%
Great: 402%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$55
107GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,705
Write 2,031
Mixed 1,894
490% 2210 MB/s
4K Read 67.1
4K Write 185
4K Mixed 94.4
320% 115 MB/s
DQ Read 1,607
DQ Write 1,251
DQ Mixed 1,367
1,040% 1,409 MB/s
Poor: 178% Great: 346%
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$90
110GB free
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,935
Write 3,279
Mixed 3,034
691% 3,083 MB/s
4K Read 80
4K Write 213
4K Mixed 116
382% 136 MB/s
DQ Read 1720
DQ Write 1,589
DQ Mixed 1,658
1,243% 1,656 MB/s
Poor: 266% Great: 477%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$70
3.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 177 176 174 177 168 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
80.3% Excellent
Read 108
Write 142
Mixed 73.2
SusWrite 172
91% 124 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
43% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 80.3%
Great: 90%
Seagate IronWolf 4TB (2016)-$87
3TB free
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 183 186 186 183 187 181 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 176
Write 174
Mixed 76
SusWrite 184
111% 153 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
163% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 103%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF552C36-32 4x31.8GB
4 of 4 slots used
127GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
120% Outstanding
MC Read 47.3
MC Write 39.5
MC Mixed 40.9
122% 42.6 GB/s
SC Read 42.5
SC Write 44
SC Mixed 42.8
123% 43.1 GB/s
Latency 86.6
46% 86.6 ns
Poor: 120%
This bench: 120%
Great: 201%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 42: 0P 5R 5G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
42% 71% 17 216 60 165 27" 2560 1440 MSI3CB0 MSI G27CQ4
Typical ROG STRIX X670E-E GAMING WIFI Builds (Compare 246 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 423%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 119%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 534%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X670E-E GAMING WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $2,596
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $376WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $250Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback