Asrockrack E3C252D4U

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 68%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics70% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive122% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrockrack E3C252D4U  (all builds)
Memory28.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20221012
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 05 '23 at 11:04
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User BGD-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (85th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E-2336
CPU1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
93.1% Outstanding
Memory 78.4
1-Core 164
2-Core 300
97% 181 Pts
4-Core 578
8-Core 942
93% 760 Pts
64-Core 1,172
73% 1,172 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 93.1%
Great: 93%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX A2000 12GB
Nvidia(10DE 1611) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 517.48
Performing below potential (64th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
70% Good
Lighting 85
Reflection 96.4
Parallax 86.3
69% 89.2 fps
MRender 110
Gravity 76.8
Splatting 79.7
71% 88.7 fps
Poor: 67%
This bench: 70%
Great: 73%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 QVO 2TB-$165
2TB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 463 448 444 476 476 474 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
122% Outstanding
Read 508
Write 478
Mixed 429
SusWrite 463
106% 470 MB/s
4K Read 38.5
4K Write 111
4K Mixed 55.2
188% 68.1 MB/s
DQ Read 371
DQ Write 317
DQ Mixed 338
255% 342 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 122%
Great: 128%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M391A2G43BB2-CWE 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
107% Outstanding
MC Read 42
MC Write 41
MC Mixed 36
113% 39.7 GB/s
SC Read 21
SC Write 41.9
SC Mixed 28.7
87% 30.5 GB/s
Latency 83.6
48% 83.6 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 107%
Great: 108%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 60 27" 1920 1080 HPN370E HP M27fw FHD
Typical E3C252D4U Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 54%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 51%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asrockrack E3C252D4U

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 43% - Average Total price: $165
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback