Gigabyte GA-X670 AORUS ELITE AX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 349%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 113%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 447%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 112%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics325% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive501% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X670 AORUS ELITE AX  (all builds)
Memory51.6 GB free of 64 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220928
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateAug 13 '23 at 03:42
Run Duration267 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D-$489
AM5, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg)
Relative performance (0th percentile)
112% Outstanding
Memory 86
1-Core 188
2-Core 373
114% 216 Pts
4-Core 736
8-Core 1,449
129% 1,093 Pts
64-Core 3,421
212% 3,421 Pts
Poor: 114%
This bench: 112%
Great: 124%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4090-$1,500
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 536.99
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
325% Outstanding
Lighting 496
Reflection 495
Parallax 609
404% 534 fps
MRender 468
Gravity 522
Splatting 287
335% 426 fps
Poor: 303%
This bench: 325%
Great: 407%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$170
1TB free
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3323 3358 3367 3386 2575 1483 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
476% Outstanding
Read 2,892
Write 3,447
Mixed 3,094
SusWrite 2,916
698% 3,087 MB/s
4K Read 75.4
4K Write 193
4K Mixed 109
357% 126 MB/s
DQ Read 1681
DQ Write 1,516
DQ Mixed 1,593
1,196% 1,596 MB/s
Poor: 278%
This bench: 476%
Great: 508%
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$170
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3440 3435 3433 3445 3429 1715 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
501% Outstanding
Read 3,066
Write 3,500
Mixed 3,162
SusWrite 3,150
728% 3,219 MB/s
4K Read 78
4K Write 217
4K Mixed 115
380% 137 MB/s
DQ Read 1,609
DQ Write 1,443
DQ Mixed 1,531
1,147% 1,528 MB/s
Poor: 278%
This bench: 501%
Great: 508%
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$170
1.5TB free
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3454 3455 3455 3452 3424 3418 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
519% Outstanding
Read 2,966
Write 3,513
Mixed 3,152
SusWrite 3,443
740% 3,269 MB/s
4K Read 78.3
4K Write 220
4K Mixed 116
383% 138 MB/s
DQ Read 1,665
DQ Write 1,526
DQ Mixed 1,603
1,201% 1,598 MB/s
Poor: 278%
This bench: 519%
Great: 508%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMT64GX5M2B6000Z30 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 6000 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
310% Outstanding
MC Read 224
MC Write 68
MC Mixed 78
352% 123 GB/s
SC Read 47.7
SC Write 70.7
SC Mixed 59.5
169% 59.3 GB/s
Latency 71.2
56% 71.2 ns
Poor: 164%
This bench: 310%
Great: 310%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 240 24.5" 1280 720 DELA161 AW2521HF
Typical GA-X670 AORUS ELITE AX Builds (Compare 360 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 414%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 118%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 422%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X670 AORUS ELITE AX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Outstanding Total price: $2,095
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback