Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	7.35% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (48^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-1220P 336 User benchmarks, average bench 71% U3E1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 12 threads Base clock 1 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	71.5% Very good	Memory 61.1 1-Core 108 2-Core 235 71% 135 Pts	4-Core 438 8-Core 802 74% 620 Pts	64-Core 707 44% 707 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 71.5% Great: 83%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 2,559 User benchmarks, average bench 10% Intel(8086 3024) 1GB Driver: <> Ver. 30.0.101.1369 Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	7.35% Terrible	Lighting 13.3 Reflection 17.4 Parallax 15.8 11% 15.5 fps	MRender 1 Gravity 1 Splatting 0.3 1% 0.77 fps
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 7.35% Great: 11%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Transcend TS256GMTE712A 256GB 212GB free (System drive) Firmware: 82B2W2AA Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	Read 2,016 Write 744 Mixed 462 232% 1,074 MB/s	4K Read 44.9 4K Write 126 4K Mixed 69.1 223% 79.9 MB/s	DQ Read 290 DQ Write 245 DQ Mixed 268 201% 268 MB/s

SanDisk Extreme Go USB 3.1 64GB-$23 2,139 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 6GB free, PID 558b Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete	Write 13.6 Mixed 1.7 12% 7.65 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 2% 0.17 MB/s
Poor: 10% Great: 64%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Transcend TS1GSH64V2B 1x8GB 11 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	52% Above average	MC Read 20.8 MC Write 19.4 MC Mixed 18.6 56% 19.6 GB/s	SC Read 9.9 SC Write 9.9 SC Mixed 14.5 33% 11.4 GB/s	Latency 124 32% 124 ns
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 52% Great: 52%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	23	2	60	21.5"	1280 720	AUS22C1 ASUS VT229

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 16%

Surfboard

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 16%

Surfboard

CPU
Core i3-1220PIntelBench 71%, 336 samples	37x

GPU
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 10%, 2,559 samples	36x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $195Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	1x

SSD
SNV2S500G 500GBKingstonBench 233%, 18,653 samples	4x
990 Pro M.2 1TBSamsung $105Bench 402%, 34,940 samples	3x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $93Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	3x

RAM
KF3200C20S4/8G 2x8GBKingstonBench 80%, 1,312 samples	5x
Skill Intl F4-2400C16-16GRS 1x16GBGBench 36%, 16 samples	2x
CT16G4SFRA32A.C16FP 2x16GBCrucialBench 87%, 608 samples	2x