Lenovo 82VG

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics4.89% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive71% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 82VG  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory8.4 GB free of 16 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230222
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 21 '23 at 17:30
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User BGR-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 7520U Graphics
FT6, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
27.9% Poor
Memory 18.3
1-Core 62.1
2-Core 102
32% 60.9 Pts
4-Core 215
8-Core 217
29% 216 Pts
64-Core 282
18% 282 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 27.9%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
Legend(17AA 380E) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 22.20.44.45
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
4.89% Terrible
Lighting 5.7
Reflection 9.9
Parallax 10
5% 8.53 fps
MRender 8.1
Gravity 6.1
Splatting 5.8
5% 6.67 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.89%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron MTFDKCD512QFM-1BD1AABLA 512GB
339GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1001V3LN
SusWrite @10s intervals: 359 336 345 354 401 395 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
71% Very good
Read 453
Write 378
Mixed 428
SusWrite 365
91% 406 MB/s
4K Read 21.1
4K Write 23.9
4K Mixed 16.6
66% 20.5 MB/s
DQ Read 370
DQ Write 107
DQ Mixed 274
193% 250 MB/s
Poor: 83%
This bench: 71%
Great: 252%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung K3LKCKC0BM-MGCP 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB 23h clocked @ 5500 MHz
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
44.4% Average
MC Read 17.3
MC Write 16.9
MC Mixed 14.9
47% 16.4 GB/s
SC Read 12
SC Write 15.6
SC Mixed 13.9
40% 13.8 GB/s
Latency 334
12% 334 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 44.4%
Great: 82%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 3: 0P 0R 1G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
3% 4% 28 116 19 60 15.5" 1536 793 LEN9051
Typical 82VG Builds (Compare 82 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 82VG

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback