Today's hottest deals

bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive70.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory56GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 56GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced.
MotherboardMicrosoft Virtual Machine
Memory50.8 GB free of 56 GB @ 0 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220509
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 23 '23 at 01:34
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD EPYC 7V12 64-Core
None, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.45 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
71.6% Very good
Memory 64.2
1-Core 108
2-Core 214
70% 128 Pts
4-Core 424
8-Core 744
70% 584 Pts
64-Core 819
51% 819 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 71.6%
Great: 72%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Microsoft Virtual Disk 274GB
151GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 126 150 117 115 135 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
70.9% Very good
Read 506
Write 174
Mixed 233
SusWrite 132
58% 261 MB/s
4K Read 65.6
4K Write 14.1
4K Mixed 22.6
136% 34.1 MB/s
DQ Read 131
DQ Write 13.8
DQ Mixed 26.3
31% 57.1 MB/s
Microsoft Virtual Disk 378GB
344GB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 197 180 153 230 164 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
71% Very good
Read 494
Write 502
Mixed 502
SusWrite 176
94% 419 MB/s
4K Read 27.1
4K Write 47.8
4K Mixed 34.4
110% 36.4 MB/s
DQ Read 130
DQ Write 131
DQ Mixed 131
98% 131 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 71%
Great: 86%
Microsoft Virtual Disk 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 211 169 163 223 148 195 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
95% Outstanding
Read 496
Write 357
Mixed 422
SusWrite 185
82% 365 MB/s
4K Read 66.1
4K Write 40.3
4K Mixed 56.4
194% 54.3 MB/s
DQ Read 128
DQ Write 41.1
DQ Mixed 47.9
45% 72.2 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 95%
Great: 82%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Microsoft Corporation None Corporation None 32GB
0, 0 MHz
1024, 32767 MB
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
129% Outstanding
MC Read 52.7
MC Write 39.3
MC Mixed 62.5
147% 51.5 GB/s
SC Read 16.8
SC Write 19.2
SC Mixed 29.8
63% 21.9 GB/s
Latency 116
34% 116 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 129%
Great: 148%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 217 59 66 0" 2048 1152
Typical bin Builds (Compare 25,036 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $322
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback