Today's hottest deals

Acer Aspire A315-24P

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics5.33% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive80.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Aspire A315-24P  (all builds)
MotherboardMDC Herbag_MDU
Memory9 GB free of 16 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230306
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 26 '23 at 23:28
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 7520U
FT6, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
41.4% Average
Memory 45.4
1-Core 54.6
2-Core 114
40% 71.2 Pts
4-Core 204
8-Core 279
30% 241 Pts
64-Core 280
17% 280 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 41.4%
Great: 67%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
Acer(1025 1654) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 22.20.24.01
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
5.33% Terrible
Lighting 6.3
Reflection 11.2
Parallax 10.8
5% 9.43 fps
MRender 8.5
Gravity 6.8
Splatting 6.1
6% 7.13 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.33%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD PC SN735 SDBPNHH-1T00-1114 1TB
904GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 70659000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 456 451 442 449 463 464 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
80.7% Excellent
Read 467
Write 383
Mixed 424
SusWrite 454
97% 432 MB/s
4K Read 18.4
4K Write 24.2
4K Mixed 18.8
65% 20.5 MB/s
DQ Read 490
DQ Write 155
DQ Mixed 431
290% 359 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 80.7%
Great: 190%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron MT62F2G32D8DR-031 WT 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB 23h clocked @ 5500 MHz
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
49.4% Average
MC Read 19.5
MC Write 18.8
MC Mixed 16.8
52% 18.4 GB/s
SC Read 11.7
SC Write 14.9
SC Mixed 13.4
38% 13.3 GB/s
Latency 179
22% 179 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 49.4%
Great: 83%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 58 32 60 15.5" 1280 720 AUOE997
Typical Aspire A315-24P Builds (Compare 147 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire A315-24P

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback