Today's hottest deals

Asus Vivobook Go E1504FA_E1504FA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.36% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive153% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsus Vivobook Go E1504FA_E1504FA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK E1504FA
Memory9.1 GB free of 16 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230905
Uptime9.4 Days
Run DateMay 04 '24 at 01:30
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User COL-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 7520U
FT6, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
66.6% Good
Memory 60.5
1-Core 116
2-Core 227
72% 134 Pts
4-Core 398
8-Core 528
59% 463 Pts
64-Core 514
32% 514 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 66.6%
Great: 67%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
Asus(1043 282D) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 22.20.42.02
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
5.36% Terrible
Lighting 6.3
Reflection 11.5
Parallax 10.2
5% 9.33 fps
MRender 9.4
Gravity 6.3
Splatting 6.1
6% 7.27 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.36%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVL4512HBLU 512GB
418GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HXC70W1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 778 785 779 788 806 808 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
153% Outstanding
Read 961
Write 807
Mixed 843
SusWrite 791
191% 851 MB/s
4K Read 37.6
4K Write 61
4K Mixed 45.2
147% 47.9 MB/s
DQ Read 710
DQ Write 216
DQ Mixed 495
356% 474 MB/s
Poor: 95%
This bench: 153%
Great: 347%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung K3LKCKC0BM-MGCP 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB 23h clocked @ 5500 MHz
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
79.4% Very good
MC Read 31.6
MC Write 28.9
MC Mixed 26.3
83% 28.9 GB/s
SC Read 19.2
SC Write 34.7
SC Mixed 21
71% 25 GB/s
Latency 131
31% 131 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 79.4%
Great: 82%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 56 60 15.5" 1280 720 SDC4161
Typical Vivobook Go E1504FA_E1504FA Builds (Compare 90 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Asus Vivobook Go E1504FA_E1504FA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $270WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback