HP Z800 Workstation

Performance Results


Gaming 25% Surfboard	Desktop 72% Battleship	Workstation 21% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	31.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	43.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	96GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 96GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP Z800 Workstation (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 0AECh
Memory	88.6 GB free of 96.002 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20160224
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Dec 20 '17 at 21:38
Run Duration	149 Seconds
Run User	ROU-User
Background CPU	100%

PC Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5675 4,275 User benchmarks, average bench 68% CPU0 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.05 GHz Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	69.8% Good	Memory 82.6 1-Core 74.9 2-Core 152 62% 103 Pts	4-Core 308 8-Core 467 48% 387 Pts	64-Core 466 29% 466 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 69.8% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro M4000 9,043 User benchmarks, average bench 32% HP(103C 1153) ≥ 4GB CLim: 772 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 361.91 Performing below potential (72^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	31.7% Below average	Lighting 37.7 Reflection 40.2 Parallax 34.3 31% 37.4 fps	MRender 49.1 Gravity 36.7 Splatting 39 34% 41.6 fps
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 31.7% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 240GB-$89 105,079 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 101GB free Firmware: 0C3F Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 8166 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 470 (64) Unknown 100 100 1956480 (65) Unknown 100 100 589856 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 100 100 277 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (B0) Unknown 100 100 0 (B1) Unknown 98 98 617 (B2) Unknown 100 100 0 (B4) Unknown 100 100 1056 (B7) Unknown 99 99 14 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 31 100 180389216287 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 100 100 0 (CC) Soft ECC correction 100 100 0 (E7) Temperature 97 97 3 (E9) Unknown 100 100 3434 (EA) Unknown 100 100 3150 (F1) Unknown 100 100 3102 (F2) Unknown 100 100 10074 (FA) Read error retry rate 100 100 0	43.9% Average	Read 253 Write 140 Mixed 85 35% 159 MB/s	4K Read 24.4 4K Write 30.1 4K Mixed 11.2 67% 21.9 MB/s	DQ Read 180 DQ Write 77.2 DQ Mixed 22 44% 93 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 43.9% Great: 88%
Kingston SSDNow UV400 240GB-$89 105,079 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 21GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0C3F Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 104 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 8246 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 472 (64) Unknown 100 100 4581472 (65) Unknown 100 100 1411776 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 100 100 297 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (B0) Unknown 100 100 0 (B1) Unknown 96 96 1403 (B2) Unknown 100 100 0 (B4) Unknown 100 100 1086 (B7) Unknown 97 97 34 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 31 100 176094183455 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 104 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 100 100 0 (CC) Soft ECC correction 100 100 104 (E7) Temperature 93 93 7 (E9) Unknown 100 100 8161 (EA) Unknown 100 100 7891 (F1) Unknown 100 100 6524 (F2) Unknown 100 100 11776 (FA) Read error retry rate 100 100 104	43.9% Average	Read 252 Write 138 Mixed 82 34% 157 MB/s	4K Read 24.5 4K Write 29.9 4K Mixed 11.4 68% 21.9 MB/s	DQ Read 167 DQ Write 91.5 DQ Mixed 23.5 46% 94 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 43.9% Great: 88%
WD WD1004FBYZ-01YCBB1 1TB 802 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 2GB free Firmware: RR03 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 143 141 3850 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2503 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 90 90 7615 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 850 (10) Unknown 0 200 38256828628 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 453 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 2555 (C2) HDA temperature 114 98 29 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	65.8% Good	Read 92.8 Write 135 Mixed 56.4 70% 94.8 MB/s	4K Read 3.26 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.38 216% 1.91 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 65.8% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown ID:80 2C 36KSF2G72PZ-1G4D1 ID:80 2C 36KSF2G72PZ-1G4D1 ID:80 2C 36KSF2G72PZ-1G4D1 ID:80 2C 36KSF2G72PZ-1G4D1 ID:80 2C 36KSF2G72PZ-1G4D1 ID:80 2C 36KSF2G72PZ-1G4D1 130GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 34816 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	40.2% Average	MC Read 15.9 MC Write 11.9 MC Mixed 17.2 43% 15 GB/s	SC Read 4.5 SC Write 4.1 SC Mixed 6.7 15% 5.1 GB/s	Latency 75.8 53% 75.8 ns
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 40.2% Great: 52%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z800 Workstation Builds (Compare 1,948 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Destroyer

Workstation 10%

Tree trunk

System: HP Z800 Workstation

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon X56501stBench 64%, 7,756 samples	318x
CPU: Intel Xeon X56751stBench 68%, 4,275 samples	189x
CPU: Intel Xeon X56701stBench 67%, 4,676 samples	180x

GPU
Quadro 4000NvidiaBench 7%, 8,609 samples	161x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	88x
Quadro 5000NvidiaBench 10%, 751 samples	68x

SSD
WDS100T2B0A-00SM50 1TBWDCBench 98%, 74,123 samples	38x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	34x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	34x

RAM
ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 58GBUnknownBench 50%, 261 samples	23x
ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 JE... 82GBUnknownBench 53%, 67 samples	19x
ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD H... 130GBUnknownBench 53%, 67 samples	16x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $289	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16