TR ST Plus-KN

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.84% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemTR ST Plus-KN  (all builds)
MotherboardTR ST Plus-KN
Memory21.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20170508
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateAug 29 '23 at 19:33
Run Duration188 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
69.8% Good
Memory 84
1-Core 88.8
2-Core 172
68% 115 Pts
4-Core 312
8-Core 378
44% 345 Pts
64-Core 474
29% 474 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 69.8%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 630
Clevo(1558 850A) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2125
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
3.84% Terrible
Lighting 4.1
Reflection 38.6
Parallax 4.8
3% 15.8 fps
MRender 6.6
Gravity 4.1
Splatting 6.7
5% 5.8 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.84%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZNTY128HDHP-00000 128GB
66GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAT2100Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 477
Write 425
Mixed 318
90% 407 MB/s
4K Read 30
4K Write 68
4K Mixed 39.2
132% 45.7 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 335
DQ Mixed 299
240% 338 MB/s
Poor: 47% Great: 102%
SSDPR-CX400-512-G2 512GB
416GB free
Firmware: SBFM61.5
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 208
Write 103
Mixed 76.9
28% 129 MB/s
4K Read 14.8
4K Write 17.5
4K Mixed 9.7
44% 14 MB/s
DQ Read 15.2
DQ Write 16
DQ Mixed 14.9
11% 15.4 MB/s
Poor: 48% Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2K43CB1-CRC 075D GR2400S464L17/16G 32GB
2400, 2400 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
74.6% Very good
MC Read 27.2
MC Write 29.5
MC Mixed 24.1
77% 26.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.6
SC Write 28.3
SC Mixed 20.2
59% 20.7 GB/s
Latency 73.4
54% 73.4 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 74.6%
Great: 75%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 60 15.5" 1280 720 AUO44ED
Typical ST Plus-KN Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

System: TR ST Plus-KN

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback