MSI MS-158K

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics16.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
10 months ago, 9 months ago.
SystemMicro-Star Bravo 15 B5DD
MotherboardMSI MS-158K  (all builds)
Memory10.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211122
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 01 '23 at 00:26
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H
FP6, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
95.7% Outstanding
Memory 79.4
1-Core 155
2-Core 305
96% 180 Pts
4-Core 601
8-Core 889
93% 745 Pts
64-Core 1,015
63% 1,015 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 95.7%
Great: 93%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 5000 (iGPU)
MSI(1462 130E) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 23.7.1
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
16.3% Very poor
Lighting 20.4
Reflection 18.7
Parallax 27.7
17% 22.3 fps
MRender 13.8
Gravity 22.6
Splatting 20.3
16% 18.9 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 16.3%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AI1 512GB
391GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFK52.8
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 824
Write 870
Mixed 804
186% 833 MB/s
4K Read 33
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 50.7
170% 62.6 MB/s
DQ Read 242
DQ Write 684
DQ Mixed 402
324% 442 MB/s
Poor: 40% Great: 203%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 16GB
0GB free, PID 5595
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 35.9
Write 3.7
Mixed 21.7
22% 20.4 MB/s
4K Read 4.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 1.3
116% 2.53 MB/s
Poor: 10% Great: 33%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Samsung M471A1K43EB1-CWE 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
87.3% Excellent
MC Read 32.3
MC Write 28.5
MC Mixed 29.6
86% 30.1 GB/s
SC Read 25.9
SC Write 42.4
SC Mixed 30.7
94% 33 GB/s
Latency 81.7
49% 81.7 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 87.3%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 144 15.5" 1280 720 CMN1521
Typical MS-158K Builds (Compare 247 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard

Motherboard: MSI MS-158K

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback