Today's hottest deals

Asrock B450M Pro4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 102%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 95%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics188% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive169% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock B450M Pro4  (all builds)
Memory12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190510
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 01 '23 at 19:03
Run Duration234 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 37%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1600-$110
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
55.9% Above average
Memory 54.3
1-Core 87
2-Core 164
56% 102 Pts
4-Core 309
8-Core 515
50% 412 Pts
64-Core 682
42% 682 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 55.9%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$806
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 471.41
Performing below potential (47th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
188% Outstanding
Lighting 271
Reflection 243
Parallax 272
221% 262 fps
MRender 309
Gravity 232
Splatting 172
187% 238 fps
Poor: 163%
This bench: 188%
Great: 202%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDBRPG0010BNC-WRSN 1TB
161GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 111110WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1376 726 701 659 627 649 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
169% Outstanding
Read 1,408
Write 1,419
Mixed 1,233
SusWrite 790
272% 1,212 MB/s
4K Read 30
4K Write 73.8
4K Mixed 37
132% 46.9 MB/s
DQ Read 747
DQ Write 330
DQ Mixed 464
364% 514 MB/s
Poor: 182%
This bench: 169%
Great: 351%
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
127GB free
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 423 434 430 422 331 337 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
87.2% Excellent
Read 264
Write 224
Mixed 282
SusWrite 396
66% 292 MB/s
4K Read 28.9
4K Write 55.2
4K Mixed 36.9
120% 40.3 MB/s
DQ Read 355
DQ Write 313
DQ Mixed 312
240% 327 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 87.2%
Great: 128%
Sandisk PLUS 240GB
166GB free
Firmware: UF4500RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 244 19 173 139 149 147 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
38.8% Below average
Read 349
Write 266
Mixed 224
SusWrite 145
55% 246 MB/s
4K Read 12.4
4K Write 19.9
4K Mixed 8.5
40% 13.6 MB/s
DQ Read 104
DQ Write 79.3
DQ Mixed 24.1
36% 69.2 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 38.8%
Great: 56%
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
6GB free
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 461
Write 363
Mixed 408
92% 411 MB/s
4K Read 28.5
4K Write 61.9
4K Mixed 37.7
124% 42.7 MB/s
DQ Read 388
DQ Write 353
DQ Mixed 370
278% 370 MB/s
Poor: 75% Great: 128%
SanDisk Cruzer Glide 32GB
28GB free, PID 5575
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.9 0.1 0.1 2.1 5.8 6 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
6.63% Terrible
Read 30.3
Write 0.7
Mixed 9
SusWrite 2.8
10% 10.7 MB/s
4K Read 3
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 1.9
86% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.63%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3600 C18 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
32.9% Below average
MC Read 12.4
MC Write 11.5
MC Mixed 11.5
34% 11.8 GB/s
SC Read 9.5
SC Write 9.1
SC Mixed 8.4
26% 9 GB/s
Latency 146
28% 146 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 32.9%
Great: 70%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 60 20" 1600 900 HSG18C5 HF207
Typical B450M Pro4 Builds (Compare 9,233 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asrock B450M Pro4 - $80

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $397
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $365
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback