SGIN N156

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 25.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics2.06% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemSGIN N156  (all builds)
MotherboardSGIN N156
Memory8.3 GB free of 12 GB @ 4.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230208
Uptime9.1 Days
Run DateSep 03 '23 at 21:44
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 42%

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron N5095A
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
25.6% Poor
Memory 18.3
1-Core 44.9
2-Core 118
30% 60.6 Pts
4-Core 187
8-Core 200
26% 193 Pts
64-Core 191
12% 191 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 25.6%
Great: 50%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Device(0000 0000) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.1999
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
2.06% Terrible
Lighting 2.8
Reflection 3.2
Parallax 2.8
2% 2.93 fps
MRender 3.7
Gravity 2.8
Splatting 0.3
2% 2.27 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.06%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HY VM-300 M.2 60G 512GB
442GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS1104J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 190 225 274 285 237 226 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 141
Write 281
Mixed 170
SusWrite 239
47% 208 MB/s
4K Read 10.3
4K Write 22.4
4K Mixed 8.5
38% 13.7 MB/s
DQ Read 156
DQ Write 171
DQ Mixed 14.7
52% 114 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix 1x12GB
1 of 2 slots used
12GB Row of chips LPDDR4 4267 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
30.8% Below average
MC Read 10.6
MC Write 12.5
MC Mixed 12.4
34% 11.8 GB/s
SC Read 5
SC Write 8.4
SC Mixed 7
19% 6.8 GB/s
Latency 333
12% 333 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 30.8%
Great: 39%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 56 44 60 15.5" 1536 864 HSD1568
Typical N156 Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: SGIN N156

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback