Compaq(intel Michelangelo(LT1504)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.53% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive70.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemCompaq(intel Michelangelo(LT1504)  (all builds)
MotherboardCompaq(Intel Michelangelo(LT1504)
Memory7.2 GB free of 12 GB @ 4.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230327
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 15 '24 at 07:06
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron N5095
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
39.6% Below average
Memory 42.1
1-Core 71.5
2-Core 142
46% 85.3 Pts
4-Core 213
8-Core 225
29% 219 Pts
64-Core 237
15% 237 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 39.6%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Device(0000 0000) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2125
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
2.53% Terrible
Lighting 2.7
Reflection 3.7
Parallax 3.1
2% 3.17 fps
MRender 4.8
Gravity 2.8
Splatting 4
3% 3.87 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.53%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
C500 512GB
274GB free (System drive)
Firmware: H220916a
SusWrite @10s intervals: 315 309 320 308 329 324 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
70.4% Very good
Read 348
Write 391
Mixed 348
SusWrite 317
79% 351 MB/s
4K Read 22.4
4K Write 56.5
4K Mixed 24.4
95% 34.4 MB/s
DQ Read 98.4
DQ Write 264
DQ Mixed 148
122% 170 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 70.4%
Great: 102%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix 1x12GB
1 of 2 slots used
12GB Row of chips LPDDR4 4267 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing below potential (90th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
39.4% Below average
MC Read 11.8
MC Write 16.5
MC Mixed 14.7
41% 14.3 GB/s
SC Read 9.2
SC Write 12.2
SC Mixed 13.1
33% 11.5 GB/s
Latency 182
22% 182 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 39.4%
Great: 39%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 6 74 56 60 15.5" 1280 720 HSD1568
Typical Michelangelo(LT1504) Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Compaq(intel Michelangelo(LT1504)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback