HP p7-1436s

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.39% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive64.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (60%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP p7-1436s  (all builds)
MotherboardMSI 2AE0
Memory4.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120821
Uptime52.9 Days
Run DateDec 22 '17 at 19:53
Run Duration166 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 60%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A6-5400K APU-$120
P0, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
47.5% Average
Memory 81.5
1-Core 56.8
2-Core 76.1
49% 71.5 Pts
4-Core 80.9
8-Core 87.5
11% 84.2 Pts
64-Core 96.4
6% 96.4 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 47.5%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7540D
HP(103C 2AE0) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 14.100.0.0
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
3.39% Terrible
Lighting 4.07
Reflection 4.46
Parallax 3.47
3% 4 fps
MRender 4.71
Gravity 3.1
Splatting 4.91
4% 4.24 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.39%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial M500 240GB-$73
34GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU05 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
64.9% Good
Read 479
Write 261
Mixed 344
80% 361 MB/s
4K Read 18.2
4K Write 29.5
4K Mixed 19.1
68% 22.3 MB/s
DQ Read 224
DQ Write 178
DQ Mixed 48.8
78% 150 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 64.9%
Great: 91%
Seagate ST310005 24AS SATA Disk Device (TurboPC EX) 1TB
84GB free
Firmware: HP64 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
47% Average
Read 83.3
Write 80.2
Mixed 79
61% 80.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.72
4K Write 1.47
4K Mixed 0.4
101% 0.86 MB/s
BUFFALO External HDD USB Device (TurboPC EX) 3TB
1TB free, PID 0257
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
58.6% Above average
Read 144
Write 142
Mixed 107
165% 131 MB/s
4K Read 1.07
4K Write 2.13
4K Mixed 0.2
83% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 58.6%
Great: 313%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HP655410-150-HYCG HP655410-150-HYCG 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
26.5% Poor
MC Read 11.6
MC Write 5.4
MC Mixed 8.7
24% 8.57 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 3.6
SC Mixed 9.4
20% 7 GB/s
Latency 77.8
51% 77.8 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 26.5%
Great: 35%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical p7-1436s Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: HP p7-1436s

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 51% - Above average Total price: $120
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback