Today's hottest deals

Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509FB_F509FB

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics6.36% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive73.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509FB_F509FB  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X509FB
Memory15.6 GB free of 20 GB @ 2.4 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210201
Uptime1.6 Days
Run DateSep 08 '23 at 21:08
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8265U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
56.6% Above average
Memory 72.3
1-Core 73.8
2-Core 128
55% 91.4 Pts
4-Core 223
8-Core 315
34% 269 Pts
64-Core 317
20% 317 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 56.6%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia MX110
Asus(1043 119F) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 27.21.14.6259
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
6.36% Terrible
Lighting 7.3
Reflection 9.6
Parallax 7.5
6% 8.13 fps
MRender 11
Gravity 7.9
Splatting 7.8
7% 8.9 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.36%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston RBUSNS8180DS3256GJ 256GB
36GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK61E1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 136 105 93 29 90 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
73.9% Very good
Read 472
Write 354
Mixed 342
SusWrite 104
71% 318 MB/s
4K Read 34.1
4K Write 70.3
4K Mixed 35.5
134% 46.6 MB/s
DQ Read 277
DQ Write 57.3
DQ Mixed 34.4
59% 123 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 73.9%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF51264HZ-2G3E1 0080 20GB
2400, 2667 MHz
4096, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
43% Average
MC Read 15.7
MC Write 15.4
MC Mixed 12.9
42% 14.7 GB/s
SC Read 11.7
SC Write 16.2
SC Mixed 15.2
41% 14.4 GB/s
Latency 96.2
42% 96.2 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 43%
Great: 66%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 60 15.5" 1536 801 CMN15F5
Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509FB_F509FB Builds (Compare 16 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509FB_F509FB

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 47% - Average Total price: $66
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback