Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 17% Surfboard	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 11.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	1.88% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	28.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

13 months ago, 13 months ago.

PC Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD GX-222GC SOC R5E Graphics 22 User benchmarks, average bench 25% P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	11.8% Very poor	Memory 17.1 1-Core 26.2 2-Core 37.9 16% 27.1 Pts	4-Core 37.1 8-Core 42.2 5% 39.7 Pts	64-Core 42.4 3% 42.4 Pts
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 11.8% Great: 35%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R5E Graphics 86 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Fijitsu Siemens(1734 1202) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02 Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	1.88% Terrible	Lighting 2 Reflection 3.9 Parallax 3.1 2% 3 fps	MRender 2.7 Gravity 2.1 Splatting 3.6 2% 2.8 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.88% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SUV500MS120G 120GB 533 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 74GB free (System drive) Firmware: 003056RI SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 66 60 69 62 76 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	28.1% Poor	Read 192 Write 204 Mixed 166 SusWrite 80.4 36% 161 MB/s	4K Read 12.7 4K Write 18.8 4K Mixed 7.6 39% 13 MB/s	DQ Read 88.6 DQ Write 92.7 DQ Mixed 79.6 63% 87 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 28.1% Great: 79%
Lexar USB Flash Drive 8GB 5,796 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 3GB free, PID a81d Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 18.6 Write 5.7 Mixed 3 9% 9.1 MB/s	4K Read 1.6 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 6% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 4% Great: 9%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5173QH0-YK0 Kingston 99U5469-056.A00LF 8GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	11.3% Very poor	MC Read 4.1 MC Write 3 MC Mixed 4.4 11% 3.83 GB/s	SC Read 3.8 SC Write 3.3 SC Mixed 4.3 11% 3.8 GB/s	Latency 343 12% 343 ns
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 11.3% Great: 50%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	38	20	60	14.2"	1280 720	AMD0009

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM