Supermicro Super Server

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (7th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 93 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive35.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemSupermicro Super Server  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro X10SRL-F
Memory26.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191122
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 09 '23 at 15:51
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 25%

 PC Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2630L v4
CPU1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
37.1% Below average
Memory 36.2
1-Core 44.8
2-Core 113
35% 64.6 Pts
4-Core 204
8-Core 365
34% 285 Pts
64-Core 705
44% 705 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 37.1%
Great: 66%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$112
42GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 170 178 166 175 177 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
35.1% Below average
Read 208
Write 143
Mixed 148
SusWrite 173
38% 168 MB/s
4K Read 6.7
4K Write 12.6
4K Mixed 9.1
28% 9.47 MB/s
DQ Read 193
DQ Write 139
DQ Mixed 162
122% 165 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 35.1%
Great: 124%
Areca Raid6_1 160TB
16TB free
Firmware: R001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 489 492 517 472 482 490 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
66.9% Good
Read 648
Write 466
Mixed 325
SusWrite 490
108% 482 MB/s
4K Read 19.6
4K Write 15.5
4K Mixed 2
40% 12.4 MB/s
DQ Read 0.7
DQ Write 1.1
DQ Mixed 7.5
4% 3.1 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 66.9%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393A1G43DB0-CPB 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
59% Above average
MC Read 23
MC Write 28
MC Mixed 22.9
70% 24.6 GB/s
SC Read 3.6
SC Write 4.3
SC Mixed 5.9
13% 4.6 GB/s
Latency 221
18% 221 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 59%
Great: 121%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 17 13 64 0" 1280 720
Typical Super Server Builds (Compare 739 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser

System: Supermicro Super Server

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 112% - Outstanding Total price: $590
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $374WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $417
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback