Supermicro Super Server

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (7th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 93 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive30.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (84%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemSupermicro Super Server  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro X10SRL-F
Memory9.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191122
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 11 '23 at 14:15
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 84%

 PC Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel 0000
CPU1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Relative performance (0th percentile)
51.9% Above average
Memory 63.3
1-Core 61.3
2-Core 110
48% 78.4 Pts
4-Core 222
8-Core 307
33% 264 Pts
64-Core 719
44% 719 Pts
Poor: 81%
This bench: 51.9%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$112
42GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 123 123 118 120 132 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
30.2% Below average
Read 196
Write 133
Mixed 136
SusWrite 124
33% 147 MB/s
4K Read 6.7
4K Write 11.4
4K Mixed 8.3
27% 8.8 MB/s
DQ Read 161
DQ Write 130
DQ Mixed 141
107% 144 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 30.2%
Great: 124%
Areca Raid6_1 160TB
16TB free
Firmware: R001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 370 339 339 331 343 372 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
52.1% Above average
Read 490
Write 364
Mixed 310
SusWrite 349
85% 378 MB/s
4K Read 19.5
4K Write 14.1
4K Mixed 2.2
40% 11.9 MB/s
DQ Read 4.3
DQ Write 11.2
DQ Mixed 0.2
2% 5.23 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 52.1%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393A1G43DB0-CPB 2x8GB
2 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
39.9% Below average
MC Read 16.1
MC Write 17.8
MC Mixed 13.9
46% 15.9 GB/s
SC Read 2.7
SC Write 4
SC Mixed 3
9% 3.23 GB/s
Latency 118
34% 118 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 39.9%
Great: 71%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 19 14 64 0" 1280 720
Typical Super Server Builds (Compare 746 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser

System: Supermicro Super Server

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 105% - Outstanding Total price: $632
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $120
Intel Core i5-12400F $89Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $195Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $373
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback