Asus H81M-K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.62% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive51.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus H81M-K  (all builds)
Memory9 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160222
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 11 '23 at 11:40
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User LKA-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-4160-$79
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
57.7% Above average
Memory 77.3
1-Core 96
2-Core 155
65% 109 Pts
4-Core 220
8-Core 234
30% 227 Pts
64-Core 232
14% 232 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 57.7%
Great: 67%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 620
Device(0000 0000) 1GB
CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 325 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
1.62% Terrible
Lighting 1.9
Reflection 1.4
Parallax 0.3
2% 1.2 fps
MRender 2.6
Gravity 2.1
Splatting 1.9
2% 2.2 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.62%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 830 128GB-$109
28GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXM03B1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 181 187 175 183 166 181 MB/s
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
51.2% Above average
Read 226
Write 195
Mixed 175
SusWrite 179
44% 194 MB/s
4K Read 20.2
4K Write 50
4K Mixed 21.7
85% 30.6 MB/s
DQ Read 170
DQ Write 69.5
DQ Mixed 101
80% 114 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 51.2%
Great: 76%
Seagate ST3320820AS 309GB
60GB free
Firmware: 3.AAD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 52 52 52 52 53 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
36.6% Below average
Read 75.1
Write 25.7
Mixed 36.8
SusWrite 52.2
35% 47.5 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.8
145% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 36.6%
Great: 41%
StoreJet Transcend 2TB
146GB free, PID 7000
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 124 127 112 128 128 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
38.2% Below average
Read 49.2
Write 72
Mixed 64.5
SusWrite 123
113% 77.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.2
54% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 38.2%
Great: 55%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 0420 F3-1600C11-4GIS 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
32.4% Below average
MC Read 11.2
MC Write 11.1
MC Mixed 9.2
30% 10.5 GB/s
SC Read 10.9
SC Write 11.9
SC Mixed 10.2
31% 11 GB/s
Latency 85.7
47% 85.7 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 32.4%
Great: 38%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 47 25 60 18.5" 1280 720 HWP3346 HP V194
Typical H81M-K Builds (Compare 6,182 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H81M-K - $50

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $287
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback