Asrock X370 Gaming X

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics44.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive31.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
9 months ago, 7 months ago.
MotherboardAsrock X370 Gaming X  (all builds)
Memory24.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20221027
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateSep 16 '23 at 06:19
Run Duration235 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 22%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5700X-$160
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
58.9% Above average
Memory 69.1
1-Core 57.1
2-Core 115
49% 80.5 Pts
4-Core 263
8-Core 569
48% 416 Pts
64-Core 1,536
95% 1,536 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 58.9%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
Asus(1043 051D) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1256 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 23.9.1
Performing below potential (44th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
44.4% Average
Lighting 54.9
Reflection 58.6
Parallax 76.2
45% 63.2 fps
MRender 59.5
Gravity 61.7
Splatting 43
44% 54.7 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 44.4%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CT500BX500SSD1 500GB
296GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR061
SusWrite @10s intervals: 277 8.5 93 61 12 61 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
31.7% Below average
Read 366
Write 334
Mixed 26.7
SusWrite 85.5
45% 203 MB/s
4K Read 17.5
4K Write 18.7
4K Mixed 0.4
37% 12.2 MB/s
DQ Read 63
DQ Write 25.8
DQ Mixed 0.4
12% 29.7 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 31.7%
Great: 81%
WD Elements 25A3 12TB
7TB free, PID 25a3
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 162 168 164 170 164 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
73.4% Very good
Read 157
Write 164
Mixed 108
SusWrite 162
201% 148 MB/s
4K Read 2.2
4K Write 4.8
4K Mixed 1.5
222% 2.83 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 73.4%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HX432C16FB/8 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
83.2% Excellent
MC Read 34.4
MC Write 24
MC Mixed 31.1
85% 29.8 GB/s
SC Read 24.9
SC Write 23.9
SC Mixed 33.3
78% 27.4 GB/s
Latency 104
39% 104 ns
Poor: 83%
This bench: 83.2%
Great: 116%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 55 26 60 72.3" 1296 759 GSM0001 LG TV SSCR2
Typical X370 Gaming X Builds (Compare 242 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asrock X370 Gaming X

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $444
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback