Today's hottest deals

HP p6705es

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics12.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive58.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP p6705es  (all builds)
MotherboardMSI 2A9C
Memory12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20101105
Uptime2872.3 Days
Run DateSep 16 '23 at 10:51
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 870-$100
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
69.5% Good
Memory 94.1
1-Core 83.2
2-Core 151
67% 109 Pts
4-Core 251
8-Core 324
37% 287 Pts
64-Core 364
23% 364 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 69.5%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 250X
Asus(1043 3009) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.0
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
12.6% Very poor
Lighting 15.9
Reflection 17.8
Parallax 22.6
13% 18.8 fps
MRender 14.3
Gravity 17.2
Splatting 12.5
12% 14.7 fps
Poor: 9%
This bench: 12.6%
Great: 14%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX100 250GB-$91
137GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 237 229 230 190 188 187 MB/s
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
58.2% Above average
Read 236
Write 230
Mixed 203
SusWrite 210
50% 220 MB/s
4K Read 18.3
4K Write 56.4
4K Mixed 26.1
91% 33.6 MB/s
DQ Read 167
DQ Write 180
DQ Mixed 148
118% 165 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 58.2%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 99U5471-057.A00LF 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
41.8% Average
MC Read 16.1
MC Write 12.9
MC Mixed 12.8
40% 13.9 GB/s
SC Read 11.1
SC Write 10.7
SC Mixed 12.3
32% 11.4 GB/s
Latency 60.5
66% 60.5 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 41.8%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 55 120 23.8" 1280 720 GSM5C19 LG ULTRAGEAR
Typical p6705es Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP p6705es

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $135
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $278WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback