Today's hottest deals

Asrock QC5000-ITX/PH

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 31%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 30.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics8.23% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock QC5000-ITX/PH  (all builds)
Memory1.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141027
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 06 '16 at 21:07
Run Duration254 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A4-5000 APU
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 1.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
30.3% Below average
Memory 50.2
1-Core 22.7
2-Core 37.8
26% 36.9 Pts
4-Core 61.5
8-Core 68.6
9% 65.1 Pts
64-Core 63.4
4% 63.4 Pts
Poor: 15%
This bench: 30.3%
Great: 33%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTS 450
Device(0000 0000) 1GB
Driver: nvd3dum.dll Ver. 10.18.13.6839
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
8.23% Terrible
Lighting 9.53
Reflection 11
Parallax 8.06
8% 9.53 fps
MRender 12.9
Gravity 10.1
Splatting 10.7
9% 11.2 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 8.23%
Great: 8%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS545050B9A300 500GB-$68
270GB free (System drive)
Firmware: PB4ZC61H Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
30.3% Below average
Read 54.5
Write 51.4
Mixed 48.3
39% 51.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.09
4K Write 0.31
4K Mixed 0.09
20% 0.17 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 30.3%
Great: 45%
General USB Flash Disk 4GB
3GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
7.1% Terrible
Read 26.1
Write 7.24
Mixed 8.25
14% 13.9 MB/s
4K Read 7.23
4K Write 0.008
4K Mixed 0.007
27% 2.41 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 7.1%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 99U5471-057.A00LF 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 667 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
13.2% Very poor
MC Read 4.7
MC Write 3.7
MC Mixed 4.6
12% 4.33 GB/s
SC Read 3.1
SC Write 2.8
SC Mixed 3.9
9% 3.27 GB/s
Latency 160
25% 160 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 13.2%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical QC5000-ITX/PH Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 28%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock QC5000-ITX/PH

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 11% - Very poor Total price: $30
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback