Today's hottest deals

User System

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 66%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 78%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics85.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive132% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemHUANANZHI
MotherboardHUANANZHI X99-AD3
Memory116.8 GB free of 128 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211120
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 20 '23 at 02:33
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2696 v3
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 18 cores, 36 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
69.1% Good
Memory 77.9
1-Core 82
2-Core 160
63% 107 Pts
4-Core 324
8-Core 656
58% 490 Pts
64-Core 1,988
123% 1,988 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 69.1%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega-64-$400
CLim: 1630 MHz, MLim: 945 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 23.4.3
Performing below potential (49th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
85.9% Excellent
Lighting 110
Reflection 108
Parallax 173
90% 130 fps
MRender 91.2
Gravity 129
Splatting 75.4
79% 98.7 fps
Poor: 77%
This bench: 85.9%
Great: 94%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS960G2G0C-00AJM0 960GB
131GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 231800WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1080 351 255 168 199 165 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
132% Outstanding
Read 1,408
Write 1,714
Mixed 1315
SusWrite 370
270% 1,201 MB/s
4K Read 31
4K Write 57.9
4K Mixed 40.5
130% 43.1 MB/s
DQ Read 316
DQ Write 252
DQ Mixed 309
224% 292 MB/s
Poor: 132%
This bench: 132%
Great: 245%
Seagate ST2000LM015-2E8174 2TB
352GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 109 101 58 45 61 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
38.4% Below average
Read 53.3
Write 95.2
Mixed 56.6
SusWrite 80.2
53% 71.3 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.3
97% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 38.4%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT84GL7AMR4C-RD Samsung M386B4G70DM0-CMA3 HMT84GL7AMR4C-RD Samsung M386B4G70DM0-CMA3 127GB
1867, 1867, 1867, 1867 MHz
32767, 32767, 32767, 32767 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
99.5% Outstanding
MC Read 47.4
MC Write 42.8
MC Mixed 28.1
113% 39.4 GB/s
SC Read 11.8
SC Write 16.2
SC Mixed 17
43% 15 GB/s
Latency 83.3
48% 83.3 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 60 31.5" 1280 720 HEC0030 HISENSE
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback