Today's hottest deals

Compaq(intel LT1504

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.62% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive54.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemCompaq(intel LT1504  (all builds)
MotherboardDefault Default string
Memory4.2 GB free of 12 GB @ 4.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230614
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateSep 21 '23 at 21:41
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 29%

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron N5095
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
36.2% Below average
Memory 32.5
1-Core 72.8
2-Core 143
44% 82.9 Pts
4-Core 227
8-Core 245
31% 236 Pts
64-Core 248
15% 248 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 36.2%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Intel(8086 2212) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.1999
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
2.62% Terrible
Lighting 2.8
Reflection 3.8
Parallax 3
2% 3.2 fps
MRender 4.7
Gravity 2.9
Splatting 4.3
3% 3.97 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.62%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Biwin CSE80A1A100-512G 512GB
438GB free (System drive)
Firmware: W0327A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 297 296 298 302 308 329 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
54.8% Above average
Read 312
Write 288
Mixed 272
SusWrite 305
66% 294 MB/s
4K Read 11.1
4K Write 25.3
4K Mixed 10.8
44% 15.7 MB/s
DQ Read 193
DQ Write 274
DQ Mixed 48
88% 172 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 54.8%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 53D512M64D4RQ-046 2x6GB
2 of 2 slots used
12GB Row of chips LPDDR4 4267 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
46.3% Average
MC Read 11.6
MC Write 23.9
MC Mixed 17.3
50% 17.6 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 12.7
SC Mixed 12.2
31% 10.7 GB/s
Latency 195
20% 195 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 46.3%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 60 15.6" 1280 720 BOE0747
Typical LT1504 Builds (Compare 13 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Compaq(intel LT1504

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $147
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback