Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-A320M-H-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics40.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive35% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (62%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGigabyte A320M-H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-A320M-H-CF  (all builds)
Memory11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211224
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateSep 22 '23 at 11:20
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 62%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G-$75
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
66.4% Good
Memory 70.7
1-Core 90
2-Core 179
64% 113 Pts
4-Core 354
8-Core 380
48% 367 Pts
64-Core 378
23% 378 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 66.4%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$152
Nvidia(10DE 1363) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 537.34
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
40.5% Average
Lighting 49.3
Reflection 78
Parallax 48.5
40% 58.6 fps
MRender 63.6
Gravity 46.4
Splatting 44
41% 51.3 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 40.5%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SX6000LNP 256GB
33GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V9002s45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 60 37 37 30 38 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
35% Below average
Read 266
Write 366
Mixed 217
SusWrite 46.3
50% 224 MB/s
4K Read 8
4K Write 76
4K Mixed 2.5
56% 28.8 MB/s
DQ Read 122
DQ Write 165
DQ Mixed 85.8
81% 124 MB/s
Poor: 105%
This bench: 35%
Great: 228%
Crucial BX500 120GB-$49
111GB free
Firmware: M6CR013
SusWrite @10s intervals: 290 347 66 53 54 53 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
75.5% Very good
Read 464
Write 392
Mixed 336
SusWrite 144
75% 334 MB/s
4K Read 33.6
4K Write 71.1
4K Mixed 27.5
124% 44.1 MB/s
DQ Read 171
DQ Write 324
DQ Mixed 44.4
91% 180 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 75.5%
Great: 86%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown M378A1K43BB2G3A141 CMK8GX4M1A2400C16 16GB
3000, 3000 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
95.4% Outstanding
MC Read 35.8
MC Write 37.3
MC Mixed 32.2
100% 35.1 GB/s
SC Read 21.3
SC Write 38
SC Mixed 24.7
80% 28 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
Poor: 83%
This bench: 95.4%
Great: 95%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 28: 0P 2R 3G 9B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
28% 34% 41 208 58 0 32" 1280 720 GDH0030 PHILCO
Typical GA-A320M-H-CF Builds (Compare 3,025 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320M-H-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $255
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback