Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-A320M-H-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics40.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive131% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemGigabyte A320M-H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-A320M-H-CF  (all builds)
Memory12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211224
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateJul 11 '22 at 07:11
Run Duration183 Seconds
Run User PAN-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G-$75
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
69.7% Good
Memory 66
1-Core 95.9
2-Core 197
66% 120 Pts
4-Core 423
8-Core 421
56% 422 Pts
64-Core 417
26% 417 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 69.7%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$152
Nvidia(10DE 1363) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 512.95
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
40.4% Average
Lighting 48.3
Reflection 65.3
Parallax 40.8
39% 51.5 fps
MRender 63.3
Gravity 49.3
Splatting 46.1
42% 52.9 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 40.4%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SX6000LNP 256GB
69GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V9002s45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 691 244 90 78 69 83 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
131% Outstanding
Read 1,281
Write 649
Mixed 256
SusWrite 209
131% 599 MB/s
4K Read 36.6
4K Write 90.3
4K Mixed 45.8
162% 57.6 MB/s
DQ Read 206
DQ Write 570
DQ Mixed 277
243% 351 MB/s
Poor: 105%
This bench: 131%
Great: 228%
Crucial BX500 120GB-$49
6GB free
Firmware: M6CR013
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 491
Write 436
Mixed 24.6
70% 317 MB/s
4K Read 29.1
4K Write 30.6
4K Mixed 28
96% 29.2 MB/s
DQ Read 170
DQ Write 330
DQ Mixed 1.1
71% 167 MB/s
Poor: 34% Great: 86%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2013)
448GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 115 115 115 115 115 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
64.9% Good
Read 116
Write 114
Mixed 61.9
SusWrite 110
74% 100 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 64.9%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown M378A1K43BB2G3A141 CMK8GX4M1A2400C16 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
83.4% Excellent
MC Read 31.4
MC Write 31.8
MC Mixed 28.3
87% 30.5 GB/s
SC Read 20.9
SC Write 31.7
SC Mixed 23.1
72% 25.2 GB/s
Latency 111
36% 111 ns
Poor: 83%
This bench: 83.4%
Great: 95%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-A320M-H-CF Builds (Compare 3,025 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320M-H-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $255
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback