PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
Graphics | 28.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 240% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus PRIME B360-PLUS (all builds) |
Memory | 13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20180323 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Sep 28 '23 at 20:35 |
Run Duration | 141 Seconds |
Run User | TUR-User |
Background CPU | 20% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i7-8700K-$175
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
|
87.2%
Excellent
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Asus(1043 862A) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 536.23
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
28.5%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
306GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2058 754 616 615 630 628 MB/s
|
240%
Outstanding
|
|||
WD WD80EDBZ-11B0ZA0 8TB
150GB free
Firmware: 85.00A85
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 101 94 99 97 99 MB/s
|
58%
Above average
|
|||
Seagate Expansion HDD 4TB
14GB free
Firmware: 1901
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 62 62 62 70 68 MB/s
|
31.7%
Below average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown S949B2UUH-ITR 0B2C HKED4081CAA2F2HB2 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
|
73.3%
Very good
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0% | 0% | 0 | 70 | 59 | 60 | 27" | 1920 1017 | AOC2778 2778G5 |
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-9400FIntel $83Bench 85%, 299,482 samples | 637x |
Core i5-8400Intel $140Bench 82%, 312,220 samples | 421x |
Core i7-8700Intel $145Bench 87%, 349,567 samples | 326x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 193x |
RTX 2060Nvidia $140Bench 90%, 645,160 samples | 165x |
GTX 1660-TiNvidia $143Bench 76%, 318,562 samples | 131x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 105% - Outstanding | Total price: $325 |