Alienware Aurora-R4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 79%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics102% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAlienware Aurora-R4  (all builds)
MotherboardAlienware 07JNH0
Memory9.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131126
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 30 '23 at 11:04
Run Duration166 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3820
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
73.4% Very good
Memory 86.5
1-Core 92.9
2-Core 190
71% 123 Pts
4-Core 326
8-Core 497
51% 412 Pts
64-Core 509
32% 509 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 73.4%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$270
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 537.13
Performing below potential (75th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
102% Outstanding
Lighting 135
Reflection 121
Parallax 125
110% 127 fps
MRender 142
Gravity 104
Splatting 91.3
90% 112 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 102%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX200 960GB-$80
425GB free
Firmware: MU01.6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 353 372 257 146 75 72 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
66.1% Good
Read 425
Write 376
Mixed 124
SusWrite 212
63% 284 MB/s
4K Read 21.6
4K Write 38.2
4K Mixed 27.3
88% 29 MB/s
DQ Read 291
DQ Write 93.3
DQ Mixed 236
162% 207 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 66.1%
Great: 100%
Fanxiang S102 Pro 1TB
837GB free
Firmware: SN14338
SusWrite @10s intervals: 240 218 224 231 238 237 MB/s
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
64.1% Good
Read 241
Write 222
Mixed 215
SusWrite 231
51% 227 MB/s
4K Read 23.5
4K Write 55.7
4K Mixed 29.6
103% 36.3 MB/s
DQ Read 203
DQ Write 176
DQ Mixed 182
139% 187 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 64.1%
Great: 109%
WD Game Drive 2TB
2TB free, PID 2630
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 113 119 124 122 125 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
69.7% Good
Read 128
Write 92
Mixed 68.3
SusWrite 120
134% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 8.1
4K Mixed 0.7
302% 3.13 MB/s
DQ Read 0.4
DQ Write 10
DQ Mixed 0.5
359% 3.63 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 69.7%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
90.6% Outstanding
MC Read 34.5
MC Write 38.7
MC Mixed 33.4
102% 35.5 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 13.6
SC Mixed 13
39% 13.7 GB/s
Latency 72.5
55% 72.5 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 90.6%
Great: 91%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 27" 1280 720 ACI27C4 VC279
Typical Aurora-R4 Builds (Compare 1,720 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 58%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht

System: Alienware Aurora-R4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $418
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback