Gigabyte GA-X570S AORUS MASTER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 205%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 229%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics212% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X570S AORUS MASTER  (all builds)
Memory14 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display4096 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230608
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateMar 22 '24 at 02:01
Run Duration326 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$249
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
99.1% Outstanding
Memory 74.2
1-Core 174
2-Core 338
103% 196 Pts
4-Core 663
8-Core 1,213
112% 938 Pts
64-Core 2,109
130% 2,109 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 99.1%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4080-$970
Nvidia(10DE 1794) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 5600 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 551.86
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
212% Outstanding
Lighting 270
Reflection 418
Parallax 392
220% 360 fps
MRender 491
Gravity 312
Splatting 258
278% 354 fps
Poor: 263%
This bench: 212%
Great: 305%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$90
79GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,558
Write 1,926
Mixed 1,790
395% 1,758 MB/s
4K Read 55.2
4K Write 129
4K Mixed 70.6
242% 84.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,300
DQ Write 570
DQ Mixed 249
366% 706 MB/s
Poor: 149% Great: 365%
PNY CS3040 4TB SSD
538GB free
Firmware: CS304524
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2857 1121 223 235 190 202 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
222% Outstanding
Read 1,561
Write 2,489
Mixed 1,596
SusWrite 805
364% 1,613 MB/s
4K Read 46.9
4K Write 149
4K Mixed 68.9
238% 88.3 MB/s
DQ Read 988
DQ Write 641
DQ Mixed 400
410% 676 MB/s
Poor: 196%
This bench: 222%
Great: 452%
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$171
25GB free
Firmware: 3B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,575
Write 2,840
Mixed 2,660
603% 2,692 MB/s
4K Read 66.9
4K Write 141
4K Mixed 79.3
277% 95.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,405
DQ Write 1,112
DQ Mixed 1,221
924% 1,246 MB/s
Poor: 278% Great: 508%
WD Black SN850X M.2 4TB-$293
1TB free
Firmware: 624311WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3408 3239 1983 1659 1570 1496 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
436% Outstanding
Read 3,662
Write 3,584
Mixed 2,780
SusWrite 2,226
688% 3,063 MB/s
4K Read 62.3
4K Write 165
4K Mixed 77.5
281% 101 MB/s
DQ Read 1,673
DQ Write 1,376
DQ Mixed 1,487
1,124% 1,512 MB/s
Poor: 288%
This bench: 436%
Great: 683%
WD Game Drive 2TB
354GB free, PID 2630
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 20 20 21 21 21 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
17.2% Very poor
Read 54.2
Write 34.3
Mixed 28.9
SusWrite 20.6
43% 34.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
85% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 17.2%
Great: 70%
PC SN810 NVMe WDC 1024GB
853GB free, PID 9210
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 21 21 21 21 21 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
65.1% Good
Read 37.8
Write 38.2
Mixed 35.7
SusWrite 20.8
44% 33.1 MB/s
4K Read 18.5
4K Write 16.5
4K Mixed 18
1,242% 17.7 MB/s
DQ Read 18.1
DQ Write 25.2
DQ Mixed 21
1,638% 21.4 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW32GX4M2D3600C18 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
77.3% Very good
MC Read 33.2
MC Write 25
MC Mixed 26.9
81% 28.4 GB/s
SC Read 21.8
SC Write 15.6
SC Mixed 25.5
60% 21 GB/s
Latency 88.1
45% 88.1 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 77.3%
Great: 125%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 44 8 120 72.3" 1820 889 GSMC0C8 LG TV SSCR2
Typical GA-X570S AORUS MASTER Builds (Compare 1,150 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 199%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 218%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X570S AORUS MASTER

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $1,022
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback